江西财经大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 104-114.

• “三农”研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

生计策略对农户土地流转与非农就业的影响

侯明利   

  1. 河南师范大学 商学院,河南 新乡 453007
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-22 修回日期:2023-06-12 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-09-27
  • 作者简介:侯明利,河南师范大学副教授,博士,主要从事农村经济发展研究,联系方式hml7776@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“城乡融合与新发展格局战略联动的内在机理与实现路径研究”(21&ZD084); 河南省高等学校哲学社会科学基础研究重大项目“数字赋能视域下现代农业内生发展的作用机理与实现路径研究”(2022-JCZD-13); 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“现代农业内生发展的理论逻辑与路径选择:基于禀赋异质性微观主体视角”(2021BJJ057)

The Impact of Livelihood Strategies on Farmers’ Land Transfer and Non-Agricultural Employment

HOU Ming-li   

  1. Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
  • Received:2023-03-22 Revised:2023-06-12 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-09-27

摘要: 基于中国家庭收入调查(CHIP2018)数据,构建联立方程模型,实证分析生计策略对农户土地流转与非农就业的影响及异质性。结果表明:生计策略对农户土地流转与非农就业的联合决策影响显著,对非农就业的促进作用大于对土地流出的促进作用和土地流入的抑制作用。不同生计策略类型的农户要素配置决策呈现异质性特征,农业户土地流转与非农就业的相互影响均不显著;农业兼业户倾向于土地流入与非农就业的联合决策,二者相互抑制且显著;非农兼业户倾向于土地流转与非农就业的联合决策,非农就业与土地流出相互促进,与土地流入相互抑制,均影响显著;非农户倾向于土地流出与非农就业的联合决策,相互促进且影响显著。因此应依据农户生计策略类型实行差别化的政策措施与激励工具,提升农户要素资源配置效率,促进人地关系协调发展。

关键词: 生计策略, 非农就业, 土地流转, 联立方程, 要素配置

Abstract: Based on the data from the China Household Income Survey (CHIP2018), this paper constructs a simultaneous equation model to empirically analyze the impact and heterogeneity of livelihood strategies on farmers’ land transfer and non-agricultural employment. The results indicate that livelihood strategies have a significant impact on the joint decision-making of farmers’ land transfer and non-agricultural employment, and that the promoting effect on non-agricultural employment is greater than that on land outflow and than the inhibiting effect on land inflow. The factor allocation decisions of farmers with different livelihood strategy types exhibit the characteristics of heterogeneity, and the mutual influence between land transfer and non-agricultural employment of the agricultural households is not significant. Agricultural part-time households tend to make joint decisions on land inflow and non-agricultural employment, which mutually and significantlyinhibit each other. Thenon-agricultural part time households tend to make joint decisions between land transfer and non-agricultural employment, while non-agricultural employment promote each other with land outflow but inhibit each other with land inflow, both of which have a significant impact. The non farmers tend to make joint decisions between land outflow and non-agricultural employment, both of them promote each other and have a significant impact. Therefore, it is necessary to implement differentiated policy measures and incentive tools based on the types of livelihood strategies for farmers, improve the efficiency of factor resource allocation for farmers and promote the coordinated development of the relationship between human being and land.

Key words: livelihood strategies, non-agricultural employment, land transfer, simultaneous equation, element configuration

中图分类号: