小农户的道德伦理能保证农产品质量安全吗——基于226份肉羊养殖户的调查数据

江西财经大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 91-103.

小农户的道德伦理能保证农产品质量安全吗——基于226份肉羊养殖户的调查数据

姜安印, 杨志良

兰州大学经济学院/丝绸之路经济带建设研究中心,甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2020-06-22 修回日期:2020-11-30 出版日期:2021-01-25 发布日期:2021-01-19
通讯作者: 杨志良,兰州大学博士研究生,主要从事新型城镇化和产业组织研究,联系方式yangzhl17@lzu.edu.cn。
作者简介:姜安印,兰州大学教授,经济学博士,主要从事区域经济和产业竞争力研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“‘一带一路'倡议的共同化发展愿景研究”（19FJLB036）; 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“农民合作社创新发展研究——以肉羊产业为例”（18LZUJBWYJ060）和“创新‘一带一路'国际合作机制研究”（18LZUJBWTD008）

Can the Ethics of Small Farmers Guarantee the Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products? Based on the Survey Data of 226 Questionnaires from Mutton Sheep Farmers

JIANG An-yin, YANG Zhi-liang

Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2020-06-22 Revised:2020-11-30 Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-01-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 质量安全伦理是小农户农产品质量安全控制中重要的治理机制。然而,转型时代农业商品化和社会结构变迁使得小农户质量安全伦理治理面临困境,道德伦理能否有效约束小农户的质量安全控制行为成为未知。基于甘肃省武威市226个肉羊养殖小农户调查数据,采用双情景比较分析法,对养殖户病羊出售伦理行为的质量安全伦理治理效应、治理失效的原因以及影响因素进行实证研究。研究发现,质量安全伦理对养殖户病羊出售伦理行为的治理效应相对有限;有贷款的养殖户和空心村的养殖户更容易违背质量安全伦理而出售病羊;养殖户年龄与其质量安全伦理认知存在反向关系,而邻里间的评价、技术培训、政策性的内容宣传和养殖户的优质优价信念则与其质量安全伦理认知存在正向关系;养殖户风险偏好、收入水平、党员身份和参加技术培训与其实际质量安全伦理行为存在正向关系。

关键词: 小农户, 道德伦理, 质量安全, 病羊出售

Abstract: Quality and safety ethics is an important governance mechanism in the quality and safety control of small farmers' agricultural products. However, the agricultural commercialization during the transformation era and the changing social structures make the ethical governance of quality and safety of small farmers face a dilemma, and whether morality and ethics can effectively constrain their quality and safety control behaviors has become unknown. Based on the survey data of 226 small farmers of mutton sheep in Wuwei City, Gansu Province, this paper employs a double scenario comparative analysis method to empirically study the governance effect of quality and safety ethics on the ethical behavior of sales of sick sheep by the farmers, the causes of governance failure and the influencing factors. It is found that quality and safety ethics have a relatively limited effect on the ethical behavior of selling sick sheep by the mutton sheep farmers. Farmers with loans and farmers in hollow villages are more likely to sell sick sheep contrary to quality and safety ethics. There exists a reverse relationship between the age and the quality and safety ethical perception of the farmers; and there exists a positive relationship between neighborhood evaluation, technical training, policy content publicity, high-quality-high-price belief of the farmers and their quality and safety ethical perception. And there exists a positive relationship between farmers' risk preference, income level, Party member status, participation in technical training and their actual quality and safety ethical behaviors.

Key words: small farmers, morality and ethics, quality safety, sick sheep for sale

中图分类号:

F304.3

姜安印, 杨志良. 小农户的道德伦理能保证农产品质量安全吗——基于226份肉羊养殖户的调查数据[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2021, 0(1): 91-103.

JIANG An-yin, YANG Zhi-liang. Can the Ethics of Small Farmers Guarantee the Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products? Based on the Survey Data of 226 Questionnaires from Mutton Sheep Farmers[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2021, 0(1): 91-103.

参考文献

[1] Gremmen B., Blok V., Bovenkerk B.Responsible Innovation for Life: Five Challenges Agriculture Offers for Responsible Innovation in Agriculture and Food, and the Necessity of an Ethics of Innovation[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2019, 32(5): 673-679.
[2] 曹俊金, 阮赞林. 小农户生产经营食用农产品质量安全的法律治理研究[J]. 食品科学, 2020,(2):1-12.
[3] 王建华, 杨晨晨, 唐建军. 养殖户损失厌恶与病死猪处理行为——基于404家养殖户的现实考察[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019,(4):130-144.
[4] 雷百战,郑玉燕, 肖广江. 我国农产品质量安全监管存在的问题及对策[J]. 现代农业科技, 2008,(12):361-362.
[5] 郑风田. 从食物安全体系到食品安全体系的调整——我国食物生产体系面临战略性转变[J]. 财经研究, 2003,(2):70-75.
[6] Jensen K.K., Sandoe P. Food Safety and Ethics: The Interplay between Science and Values[J]. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 2002, 15(3): 245-253.
[7] Janker J., Mann S. Moral Conflicts, Premises and the Social Dimension of Agricultural Sustainability[J]. Agriculture and Human Values Sustainability, 2020, 3710(112): 97-111.
[8] Peterson E.W. F. WTO Dispute Settlement and Food and Agricultural Trade[M]. Bertin: Springer Netherlands, 2013: 1-8.
[9] Pluhar E.B. Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2010, 23(5): 455-468.
[10] Borkfelt S., Kondrup S., Röcklinsberg H.Closer to Nature? A Critical Discussion of the Marketing of “Ethical” Animal Products[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2015, 28(6): 1053-1073.
[11] 余吉安,杨斌. 质量伦理、信息传递与模式变革:社会责任视角下食品企业的战略创新[J]. 中国软科学, 2016,(1):184-192.
[12] 姜启军. 企业社会责任与食品质量安全管理的理论和实证分析[J]. 华东经济管理, 2013,(2):92-96.
[13] 徐新. 食品消费安全的伦理思考[J]. 伦理学研究, 2013,(2):107-111.
[14] 何昕. 论食品伦理的基本原则[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(2):114-119.
[15] 杨光飞,梅锦萍. 市场转型与经济伦理重塑——对近年来食品安全问题的伦理反思[J]. 伦理学研究, 2011,(6):20-24.
[16] 陈文军. 论企业战略管理中的伦理决策[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2011,(3):99-104.
[17] 喻文德. 论食品安全的三重伦理防线[J]. 伦理学研究, 2011,(6):25-29.
[18] 余吉安, 杨斌. 企业社会责任、质量伦理与战略[J]. 科技管理研究,2015,(16):251-25.
[19] 方金. 中国农产品生产与交易中的不道德现象及应遵循的伦理准则[J]. 中国农村观察,2009,(2):57-63.
[20] 方金,曹雪峰,季学林. 伦理视野下农产品生产与交易战略的构建[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(2):68-74.
[21] 周峰,徐翔. 政府规制下无公害农产品生产者的道德风险行为分析——基于江苏省农户的调查[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2007,(4):25-31.
[22] 郑少锋. 农产品质量安全:成因、治理途径和研究趋势[J]. 社会科学家,2016,(5):8-14.
[23] 张利国,李礼连,李学萍. 农户道德风险行为发生的影响因素分析——基于结构方程模型的实证研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报,2017,(6):77-86.
[24] Treviño L., Weaver G., Reynolds S.Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(6): 951-990.
[25] Bandura. Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1999, 3(3): 193-209.
[26] Feldman Y.Behavioral Ethics Meets Behavioral Law and Economics[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014: 65.
[27] 亚当·斯密. 道德情操论[M]. 蒋自强, 钦北愚, 朱钟棣,等译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014:36.
[28] Nooteboom B.A Cognitive Theory of the Firm[J]. 2016, 9(S2): 109-122.
[29] 诺斯D. 理解经济变迁过程[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008:95.
[30] Greene J.D., Sommerville R. B., Nystrom L. E. An FMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment[J]. Science, 2001, 293(5537): 2105-2108.