江西财经大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 134-147.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

个人数据权效力体系研究

牛彬彬   

  1. 武汉大学 法学院,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-15 修回日期:2020-05-27 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-11-03
  • 作者简介:牛彬彬,武汉大学博士研究生,主要从事人格权法、信息法研究,联系方式tudidaxian@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省软科学研究计划项目“‘互联网+'时代下浙江省共享经济法律规制研究:以网约车为例”(2018C35050)

Research on the Effectiveness System of Personal Data Rights

NIU Bin-bin   

  1. Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2020-03-15 Revised:2020-05-27 Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-11-03

摘要: 大数据时代,实现数据主体对个人数据的控制权是保护数据主体的数据隐私,构建多元数据治理体系的重要环节。为了实现个人数据隐私利益和企业数据财产利益之间的利益平衡,司法实践中将个人数据的权属认定为个人和平台共有,但这也造成了数据之上的权利黏连状态,而个人数据同非个人数据区分的失效也加剧了两种权利之间的冲突。所以有必要细化个人数据同企业数据之间共有制度,构建个人数据权效力体系。个人数据权对抗效力体系的建构,应当遵循利益平衡原则、风险导向原则和类型区分原则。将个人数据分为“内容导向”的个人数据和“目的导向”的个人数据。前者需要赋予数据主体以访问权、修改权、删除权、可携带权,对抗企业的数据财产权,而后者则赋予数据主体以反对权、算法解释权,为了保障数据质量,修改权、删除权和被遗忘权则只能通过间接方式加以实现。

关键词: 个人数据, 个人数据权, 效力体系, 动态博弈

Abstract: In the era of big data, realizing data subjects' control over personal data is an important link in protecting data subjects' data privacy and constructing a multiple data governance system. In order to achieve a balance of interests between the privacy interests of personal data and the property interests of corporate data, in judicial practice, the ownership of personal data is recognized as being shared by individuals and platforms, however, this has also resulted in the binding of rights over data, and the failure of the distinction between personal data and non-personal data also exacerbates the conflicts between the two rights. Therefore, it is necessary to detailing the sharing system between personal data and corporate data and to construct a system for the effectiveness of personal data rights. The construction of the anti-effectiveness system of personal data rights should follow the principle of balancing the interests, the principle of risk orientation, and the principle of classification. The personal data should be divided into“content-oriented”personal data and“purpose-oriented”personal data. As for the former, the data subjects need to be endowed with the right to access, the right to modify, the right to delete, the right of portability, and the data property right as opposed to enterprises; while for the latter, the data subjects need to be given the right to object and the right to interpret the algorithms. In order to ensure data quality, the right to modify, the right to delete, and the right to be forgotten can only be realized through indirect means.

Key words: personal data, personal data rights, effectiveness system, dynamic game

中图分类号: