江西财经大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 120-.

• • 上一篇    

脆弱性视角下家庭养老与社会养老的互动机制——基于全国8个省份1371份调查数据

徐 强1,周 杨2   

  1. (1. 华南农业大学 公共管理学院,广东 广州 510642;2. 广东工业大学 管理学院,广东 广州 510520)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:徐 强,华南农业大学副教授,管理学博士,主要从事社会保障理论与政策研究,通讯作者联系方式xuqiang828@126.com;周 杨,广东工业大学副教授,管理学博士,主要从事乡村振兴理论与政策研究。

The Interactive Mechanism between Family Supporting and Social Provision from the Perspective of Vulnerability: Based on 1371 Survey Data from China’s 8 Provinces

XU Qiang1, ZHOU Yang2   

  1. (1. South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642; 2. Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 自2009年新农保试点运行以来,社会养老嵌入家庭养老的社会情境并产生互动机制,厘清家庭养老和社会养老的互动机制有助于实现“老有所养”“老有所乐”的养老目标。基于2018年全国8个省份1371份调查数据,运用logistic回归模型探讨社会养老参保行为对公众养老担忧度和家庭养老地位的影响。研究发现,公众的养老担忧较为普遍,74.2%的被调查对象担心自己的养老问题。随着年龄的增长,公众的养老担忧度逐步下降;健康状况越差,养老担忧度越高。社会养老参保行为显著降低养老担忧度,与家庭养老产生“协同效应”。家庭养老地位的社会认知度高,87.3%的被调查对象认为家庭养老发挥重要作用。年龄和文化程度较低者、子女和家庭储蓄较多者更加注重传统的家庭养老;社会养老缓解居民的养老经济风险,弱化对家庭养老功能的预期,对家庭养老产生一定的“替代效应”。

关键词: 脆弱性,家庭养老,社会养老,互动机制

Abstract: The social situation that social provision embedding in family supporting has generated an interactive mechanism since the new rural insurance pilot in 2009. To clarify the interactive mechanism of family supporting and social provision can help to achieve the targets for the aged people with a better life. Based on 1371 survey data in China’s 8 provinces in 2018, this paper adopts the logistic regression model to explore the impact of participation in public pension system on people’s worrying about old-age life and the status of family supporting. The findings of this study show that people’s worrying about old-age life are a relatively common thing, 74.2% of the research objects are worrying about their old-age life. As they get older, people’s worrying about their old-age life is gradually declining; the worse their health condition, the greater their worries about their old-age life. The participation in public pension system can significantly reduce people’s worrying and create a “synergy effect” with family supporting. The social recognition of the status of family supporting is higher, 87.3% of the research objects believes that family supporting plays an important role. Those with lower age and lower education level, more children and more family savings pay more attention to traditional supporting. The social provision system can effectively reduce the pension risks of urban and rural residents and weaken the expectation of the family supporting function, thus creating a certain level of “substitution effect” on family supporting.

Key words: vulnerability; family supporting; social provision; interaction mechanism