江西财经大学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (03): 212-.

• • 上一篇    

基于扎根理论的畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用分析:农户行为与政策干预路径

潘 丹1,孔凡斌2   

  1. (1. 江西财经大学 经济学院,江西 南昌 330013;2. 江西省社会科学院,江西 南昌 330077)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:潘 丹,江西财经大学副教授,主要从事资源环境经济与农业经济研究,通讯作者联系方式blesspanda@163.com;孔凡斌,江西省社会科学院研究员,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事生态经济研究。

An Analysis of Waste Cyclic Utilization in Livestock Breeding Based on the Grounded Theory: Farmers’ Behavior and Policy Intervention Paths

PAN Dan1, KONG Fan-bin2   

  1. (1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013; 2. Jiangxi Academy of Social Sciences, Nanchang 330077, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用是新时期我国实施乡村振兴战略的重要任务,是我国畜禽养殖业可持续发展的必然选择。运用扎根理论研究方法探讨畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用农户行为及政策干预路径,结果发现,循环利用意识、循环利用成本收益、社会参照三个主范畴是农户畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用行为的主要影响因素。但它们对农户畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用行为的影响方式和影响路径并不一致,循环利用意识是影响农户畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用行为的内因和诱发性因素;循环利用成本收益是影响农户畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用行为的内部情境因素;社会参照则通过对循环利用意识和循环利用成本收益产生影响,进而影响农户畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用行为。知识传播和制度技术两个主范畴是畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用的干预政策,且这两类干预政策是相互补充和相互配合的。通过知识传播影响循环利用意识和社会参照,通过制度技术影响循环利用成本收益是畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用的主要政策干预路径。

关键词: 扎根理论,畜禽养殖废弃物,农户行为,政策干预

Abstract: The cyclic utilization of the waste in livestock breeding is not only an important task of China to carry out the rural vitalization strategy in the new era but also the inevitable choice for the sustainable development of China’s livestock breeding industry. This paper tries to explore the farmers’ behavior and policy intervention paths in the cyclic utilization of waste in livestock breeding with the grounded theory. The results show that the three major categories, i.e., the sense of cyclic utilization, the cost and benefit of cyclic utilization and social reference criterion, are the major factors affecting farmers’ behavior in the cyclic utilization of livestock waste. However, the ways and paths of their impacts on the farmers’ behaviors are different. The sense of cyclic utilization is the internal cause and the inducing factor affecting the farmers’ behavior in the cyclic utilization of livestock waste; the cost and benefit of cyclic utilization is the internal situational factor affecting the farmers’ behavior; while the social reference criterion would affect farmers’ livestock waste recycling behavior by influencing the sense of cyclic utilization, as well as the cost and benefit of cyclic utilization. The two major categories, i.e., knowledge communication and institutional technology, are the policy intervention paths of livestock waste recycling, and these two intervention policies are mutual complementing and interacting. To affect the sense of cyclic utilization and the social reference through knowledge communications and to affect the cost and benefit of cyclic utilization through institutional technology are the major policy intervention paths for the livestock waste recycling.

Key words: the grounded theory; livestock breeding waste; farmers’ behavior; policy intervention