江西财经大学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (01): 246-.

• • 上一篇    

所有制差异、企业动态更替与外延型资源错配

靳来群1,莫长炜2   

  1. (1. 宁波大学 商学院,浙江 宁波 315211;2. 厦门大学 经济学院,福建 厦门 361005)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:靳来群,宁波大学讲师,主要从事资源配置效率研究,通讯作者联系方式laiqun2006@126.com;莫长炜,厦门大学副教授,主要从事产业组织理论研究。

Ownership Differences, Firms Dynamic Substitution and Extensive Resource Misallocation

JIN Lai-qun1, MO Chang-wei2   

  1. (1. Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211; 2. Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 虽然国企改革过程中的“抓大放小严进入”提升了国有部门生产率,但在二元所有制体制下,中国经济整体的企业动态更替过程及其带来的市场选择效应、学习效应和竞争效应仍存在较大的扭曲。利用中国工业企业微观数据的实证分析表明:(1)所有制歧视降低了民营企业的市场进入率,提高了其市场退出率,进而扭曲了企业动态更替的过程;(2)全要素生产率(TFP)较高的民营企业被TFP较低的国有企业“淘汰”了,即在二元所有制下大量“僵尸”国有企业破坏了企业动态更替的市场选择效应;(3)民营新进入企业通过学习效应实现了TFP的快速增长,而国有新进入企业却存在着明显的退步效应;(4)企业更替带来的竞争效应仅对民营企业有效,而对国有企业并无显著作用。

关键词: 所有制,企业进入与退出,外延型资源错配,全要素生产率

Abstract: Although the policy of“invigorating large enterprises while relaxing control over small ones and strictly control the entrance”during the process of the reform of state-owned enterprises has improved the productivity of the state-owned sector, however, under the system of dual ownership, there exists distortion of larger degree in the process of enterprise dynamic replacement and its market selection effect, learning effect, and competition effect in China’s whole economy. By using the micro data of China’s manufacturing industry, this paper conducts an empirical analysis. The results show that: (1) the ownership discrimination has reduced the market entry rate of private enterprises and increased its exit rate, thus distorted the process of enterprise dynamic substitution; (2) the private firms with higher TFP have been eliminated by the state-owned firms with lower TFP, i.e., a large number of“zombie”state-owned firms under the dual ownership structure has destroyed the market selection effect of enterprise dynamic substitution; (3) the newly entered private firms have achieved rapid growth of TFP through learning effect, while the newly entered state-owned firms have clear backward effect; (4) the competition effect brought forward by enterprise replacement is only effective in the private firms, not in the state-owned ones.

Key words: ownership; firms entry and exit; extensive resource misallocation; TFP