江西财经大学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (01): 241-.

• • 上一篇    

粮食布局、非农就业与土地流转——基于CHIP2013的分析

赵军洁1,吴天龙2   

  1. (1. 农业部管理干部学院 科研管理处,北京 102208;2. 农业部农村经济研究中心 宏观经济研究室,北京 100810)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:赵军洁,农业部管理干部学院副研究员,管理学博士,主要从事农业规模经营问题的研究,通讯作者联系方式 rmdx14@163.com;吴天龙,农业部农村经济研究中心助理研究员,管理学博士,主要从事土地流转问题的研究。

Grain Distribution, Non-Farm Employment and Land Transfer: An Analysis Based on CHIP2013 Date

ZHAO Jun-jie1, WU Tian-long2   

  1. (1. Agricultural Management Institute of the Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 102208; 2. Research Center for Rural Economy of the Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100810, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 利用CHIP2013数据,采用OLS和Mvprobit模型考察不同粮食布局和非农就业对农户土地流转面积和方式选择的影响,研究发现,非农就业机会选择会显著降低土地流转,非农就业工资比例、非农就业时间则正向显著影响土地流转。粮食主产区的农民倾向于土地流转,非农就业提升了粮食主产区对土地流转的促进作用;粮食主销区的农民不倾向于土地流转,非农就业提升了粮食主销区对土地流转的抑制作用;粮食平衡区对土地流转的影响不显著,加入非农就业变量后仍不显著。粮食主产区的农民更倾向于有偿流转给个人,粮食主销区和平衡区的农民则不愿意流转给个人;相对于流转给村集体,农民更倾向于选择有偿流转给个人和有偿流转给企业或农业大户。为进一步提高粮食安全保障水平,应该按照粮食布局区别对待农户土地流转,并对非农就业制定不同措施。

关键词: 粮食布局,非农就业,土地流转,粮食安全,Mvprobit模型

Abstract: By making use of the CHIP2013 data, this paper examines the impact of grain distribution and non-farm employment on the area and mode selection of farmers’ land transfer with OLS and Mvprobit models. The findings show that the non-farm employment opportunity can significantly reduce the size of land transfer, while the payroll scale and time of non-farm employment can have a significant positive impact on land transfer. The farmers in the major grain producing areas tend to transfer their land, and the non-farm employment can enhance this promotion effect; while the farmers in the major grain sale areas do not tend to transfer their land, and the non-farm employment can enhances this inhibition effect; as for the grain balanced areas, there is no significant effect on land transfer, it is not significant even if the variable of non-farm employment is added. The farmers in the major grain producing areas are prefer to transfer their land to individuals with compensation, while the farmers in the major grain sale areas and the balanced areas are not willing to transfer their land to individuals; compared to transferring their land to the village collective, the farmers prefer to transfer their land to individuals, enterprises or large farmer-households with compensation. In order to further raise the level of grain safety guarantee, we should treat farmers’ land transfer differently in accordance with the distribution of grain production, and formulate different policies for non-farm employment.

Key words: grain distribution; non-farm employment; land transfer; food security; Mvprobit model