江西财经大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (02): 316-.

• • 上一篇    

中等收入持续期及其影响因素分析——构建橄榄型收入结构视角

徐佳舒1,段志民2   

  1. (1. 北京师范大学 社会发展与公共政策学院,北京 100875;2. 天津财经大学 统计学院,天津 300222)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:徐佳舒,北京师范大学博士研究生,主要从事基金会管理、社会公益研究,通讯作者联系方式xujiashu@yeah.net;段志民,天津财经大学讲师,博士,主要从事收入分配、劳动经济学研究。

An Analysis of the Duration of Middle Income and Its Influencing Factors: From the Perspective of Constructing Olive-Shaped Income Structure

XU Jia-shu1, DUAN Zhi-min2   

  1. (1. Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;2. Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 扩大中等收入者比重、构建橄榄型收入结构是我国发展新阶段的重要目标,而延长中等收入持续期又是扩大中等收入者比重的主要途径。基于1989-2011年CHNS九轮数据,在度量中等收入者的基础上,发现我国居民中等收入持续时间均值为8.97年,中位值为7年,且存在明显的负时间相依性。采用控制个体不可观测异质性特征的持续期模型分析各种影响因素,结果发现个体特征如性别、年龄、受教育程度及工作单位类型和地区特征如人均GDP、基尼系数、失业率及市场化程度等均对中等收入者持续期产生显著影响。同时,中等收入持续时间存在显著的城乡差别和区域差别。结论认为要改善低收入者的劳动力市场前景和机遇,构建覆盖城乡居民、不同单位类型居民的社会保障与福利体系,并针对不同地区的收入流动性结构特点,采取不同的区域政策。

关键词: 中等收入者,持续期模型,收入结构,异质性

Abstract: To expand the proportion of the middle-income groups and construct olive-shaped income structure is an important goal in the new stage of China’s development, while to extend the duration of middle income is the main path for the expansion of the proportion of the middle-income groups. Based on the nine rounds survey data of CHNS from 1989 to 2011, and on the basis of the measurement of the middle-income groups, this study finds out that the time average of China’s middle income duration is 8.97 years, that the median is 7 years, and that there exists obvious negative time dependence. When the duration model which can control individual unobservable heterogeneity is adopted to analyze various influencing factors, the findings show that the individual characteristics, such as gender, age, level of education, types of work unit, and the regional characteristics, such as per capita GDP, Gini coefficient, unemployment rate, marketization degree, can produce significant effect on the duration of the middle-income groups. Meanwhile, the time of middle-income duration has significant urban-rural differences and regional differences. The conclusion believes that in order to improve the market prospect and opportunities for the low-income work force, it is necessary to construct a social security and welfare system covering the urban and rural residents and residents belonging to different work units. And different regional policies should be adopted against the structural characteristics of income mobility at different regions.

Key words: middle-income group; duration model; income structure; heterogeneity