江西财经大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (06): 341-.

• • 上一篇    

巨灾保险共保体模式适应性的博弈分析

张蕴遐,关恒业   

  1. (对外经济贸易大学 保险学院,北京 100029)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:张蕴遐,对外经济贸易大学博士研究生,主要从事巨灾保险研究,联系方式zhangyunxiarr@aliyun.com;关恒业,对外经济贸易大学博士研究生,主要从事巨灾证券研究。

A Game Theory Analysis of the Applicability of Co-Insurance Applicant Mode in Catastrophe Insurance

ZHANG Yun-xia, GUAN Heng-ye   

  1. (University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 核工业保险共保体和农业保险再保共保体是我国保险业发展历史上两个运作较为成功的共保体模式。通过对上述两个共保体的博弈分析,观察共保体机制下的两方主要的利益主体,即处于市场主导地位的大型保险公司及参与经营或潜在参与市场经营的其他小型保险公司的策略选择。针对核保险和农业保险的不同风险特征和市场情况,分别讨论两方利益主体在共保体模式和机制下合作经营、选择各自独立经营,或不参与该类保险经营时的支付函数及效用水平,得出尽管各利益主体所处的位置不同,但均可在共保模式下合作经营的策略上取得纳什均衡的结论。在此基础上进一步研究了这两种成功的共保体的共性和特性,分析了适应共保体模式的风险类型及特征,包括风险和损失属于低频、高损,缺乏大数据支持,救灾需要大量人力物力财力的投入,灾害损失对国家战略和社会安定有重大影响,具有典型的公共性特征,有较高的技术需求等,得出共保体模式和机制对于巨灾风险和保险具有高度适用性的结论。

关键词: 巨灾保险,共保体,核保险农业保险,博弈分析

Abstract: The nuclear co-insurance and agriculture reinsurance co-insurance are two of the successful co-insurance modes in the history of China’s insurance development. Through the game analysis of the above mentioned two co-insurance applicants, this paper observes the strategy choices of the two major interest parties under such mechanism, i.e., the large-scale insurance companies holding the leading position in the market and other small insurance companies participating or potentially participating the market operation. According to the different risk characteristics and market situation of nuclear insurance and agricultural insurance, it discusses the payment function and utility level of the two parties respectively when operating cooperatively in the mode of co-insurance and mechanism, choosing independent operation, or not participating this kind of insurance operation. A conclusion has been drawn that even though the different stakeholders are in different positions, they can all achieve Nash equilibrium in their co-operation strategy under the co-insurance mode. Based on this, this paper further studies the generalities and specific characteristics of these two types of successful co-insurance, and analyzes the risk types and characteristics of the co-insurance mode, including the risk and loss being low-frequency and high-loss and lacking of big data support, disaster relief requiring inputting large amount of manpower, material and financial resources, disaster losses having significant impact on the national strategy and social stability, with typical public characteristics, demanding higher technologies, etc., then it finally draws such a conclusion that the co-insurance mode and mechanism is highly applicable for catastrophe risks and insurances.

Key words: catastrophe insurance; co-insurance applicant; nuclear insurance; agriculture insurance; game theory analysis