江西财经大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (04): 366-.

• • 上一篇    

西方马克思主义对马克思新世界观的阐释及其启示

张定鑫   

  1. (江西财经大学 马克思主义学院,江西 南昌 330013)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:张定鑫,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事马克思主义基本原理研究,联系方式dxzhang323@163.com。

Western Marxists’ Interpretation of Marx’s New World View and Its Enlightenment

ZHANG Ding-xin   

  1. (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 把马克思学说称为“马克思新世界观”是合文理且恰当的。恩格斯从方法论范畴把它阐释为“历史唯物主义”或“唯物史观”,西方马克思主义对这一阐释形式作了另一番阐释,不仅形成了源于卢卡奇“历史唯物主义首要功能”的实践论、葛兰西“实践哲学”之“实践唯物主义”阐释范式,而且涌现出一系列新论断,在不同侧面推进了这一领域。这两个“阐释”形式尽管在马克思本人的著述中有一定根据,但不是马克思文本中的直接术语;尽管体现了马克思新世界观的方法论层面,但与马克思新世界观系统存在层次上的区分。应该珍视西方马克思主义及诸多国外学者关于马克思新世界观的研究论点与学术结论,但不要简单移植或模仿他们的现成结论,更不要有意无意地受其暗示。

关键词: 西方马克思主义,马克思新世界观的载体,马克思主义哲学研究的原创性

Abstract: It is both logical and appropriate to name Marx’s theory as “Marx’s new world view”. Engels interpreted it as “historical materialism” or “materialist conception of history” from the methodology category. The western Marxists made a reinterpretation of this form of interpretation, leading not only to the formation of such hermeneutic paradigms as the theory of practice originated from Lukacs’s “principal function of historical materialism” and the “practical materialism” from Gramsci’s “practical philosophy”, but also the emergence of a series of new statements, which have promoted the researches in this field from different aspects. Though these two forms of interpretation can find some grounds in Marx’s own writings, they are not the direct terms in Marx’s texts; although they can reflect Marx’s new world view from the methodology level, they are different from Mark’s new world view system at some levels. We should cherish the research arguments and academic conclusions concerning Marx’s new world view made by the western Marxists and many scholars abroad, but we cannot simply transplant or imitate their established conclusions, never accept their hints intentionally or unintentionally.

Key words: Western Marxists; carrier of Marx’s new world view; originality of Marxist philosophical studies