江西财经大学学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 438-.

• • 上一篇    

股权激励中的大股东-高管权力博弈与公司的过度投资行为

杨慧辉1,潘 飞2,奚玉芹1   

  1. (1. 上海对外经贸大学 会计学院,上海 201620;2. 上海财经大学 会计学院,上海 200433)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:杨慧辉,上海对外经贸大学副教授,博士,主要从事公司治理研究,联系方式wennie@mail.shufe.edu.cn;潘 飞,上海财经大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事管理会计研究;奚玉芹,上海对外经贸大学副教授,博士,主要从事人力资源管理研究。

Corporate Overinvestment and Power Game between Major Shareholders and Executives under Equity Incentive

YANG Hui-hui1, PAN Fei2, XI Yu-qin1   

  1. (1 Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620; 2. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 公司的财务决策是作为内部人的控股大股东与高管权力博弈的结果。因此,有必要研究股权激励能否抑制高管和大股东为实现其控制权私利而过度投资的自利行为。运用差异分析以及OLS回归,研究发现,在国有控股上市公司实施股权激励可以抑制大股东和高管的过度投资行为,股权激励水平越高,抑制作用越大;但采用期权激励方式会削弱该抑制作用。而在非国有控股上市公司实施股权激励会加剧大股东和高管的过度投资行为,股权激励水平越高,公司过度投资水平越高,当采用的是期权激励方式时,这种加剧作用更为显著。

关键词: 产权性质,大股东-高管权力博弈,过度投资,股票激励,期权激励

Abstract: A corporate financial decision-making is the result of the power game between the controlling shareholders and the executives as the insiders. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate whether equity incentive can restrain the self-interested behaviors of overinvestment by executives and major shareholders in order to realize their control power and personal gains. By adopting the difference analysis and OLS regression, this study finds out that to carry out equity incentive in the state-owned holding listed companies can restrain the excessive investment behaviors of large shareholders and executives, the higher the equity incentive level, the greater the inhibition will be; while the option incentives would undermine the suppression effect. However, in the non-state-owned holding listed companies to carry out the equity incentive would exacerbate the over-investment behavior of the large shareholders and executives, the higher the level of equity incentive, the higher the level of corporate over-investment will be; when the option incentive is adopted, this kind of intensifying role is more significant.

Key words: property nature; power game between major shareholders and executives; overinvestment; stock incentive; option incentive