江西财经大学学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 516-.

• • 上一篇    

权力与笼子:“一把手”权力制约与监督探析

曾绍东1a,周晓朗1b   

  1. (1. 江西师范大学 a. 政法学院;b. 廉政文化研究中心,江西 南昌 330022)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:曾绍东,江西师范大学副教授,博士,主要从事中国法律史研究;周晓朗,江西师范大学教授,主要从事廉政制度与文化研究,联系方式zengshaodong0785@163.com。

Power and Cage: Restriction and Spervision of Top Leaders’ Power

ZENG Shao-dong, ZHOU Xiao-lang   

  1. (Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 权力的所有权与使用权相分离、对资源分配权的集中性和强制性以及可腐蚀性、可交换性,决定了权力具有被滥用之“恶”。要遏制权力被滥用之“恶”,必须对权力进行制约与监督,将权力关进制度的笼子。其中,“一把手”权力制约与监督,是权力制约与监督的关键。制度的不健全以及缺乏制度意识的价值理性是我国“一把手”权力制约与监督问题的根本,因此,加强对“一把手”权力的制约与监督,要在对制度进行顶层设计、编织缜密的制度之笼以及培育制度意识的价值理性上下功夫。

关键词: “一把手”权力,制约,监督,制度之笼,价值理性

Abstract: Power has the evil of being abused, which is decided by the separation of power ownership and the right to use the powers, the concentration and coerciveness of the distribution right on resources, as well as its corrodibility and interchangeability. In order to curb the evil of being abused, power must be restricted, supervised and put into the institutional cage. Among them, the restriction and supervision of the top leaders’ power is the key to the restriction and supervision of power. The imperfect institution and the value rationality of lacking awareness of the institution is the root of the problem of restriction and supervision of top leaders’ power. Therefore, in order to strengthen the restriction and supervision of top leaders’ power, efforts should be made to conduct a top-level design for the institution, to weave a rigorous institutional cage, and foster the value rationality of institutional awareness.

Key words: power of top leaders; restriction; supervision; institutional cage; value rationality