江西财经大学学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 513-.

• •    

程序违法与发回重审——《民事诉讼法》第170条之检讨

占善刚,刘 芳   

  1. (武汉大学 法学院,湖北 武汉 430072)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:占善刚,武汉大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事民事诉讼法、证据法研究;刘 芳,武汉大学博士研究生,主要从事民事诉讼法研究,联系方式1061862812@qq.com。

Procedural Illegality and Remand for Retrial: A Review of Article 170 of Civil Procedure Law

ZHAN Shan-gang, LIU Fang   

  1. (Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 发回重审乃上级法院纠正下级法院错误判决的手段之一,目的在于保障当事人获得公正审判的机会。科学构建发回重审事由,有利于发回重审功能的实现。分析发回重审事由设计的理论依据,原审违反法定程序应当是发回重审的唯一事由,事实认定不清不能单独作为发回重审的事由。《民事诉讼法》第170条关于发回重审事由的设计有违诉讼法理,欠缺正当性。应当区分严重程序违法与一般程序违法而设定发回重审的事由,前者乃绝对的发回重审事由,后者只有在影响裁判结果且以维持审级制度为必要的情况下,才构成发回重审的事由。

关键词: 程序违法,发回重审,公正审判,审级利益

Abstract: Remand for retrial is one of the means for the court of appeal to correct the error of judgment of the lower court, and its purpose is to guarantee the right to the parties for a fair trial. To construct the rehearing reasons scientificly can help the realization of the function of remand for retrial. When analyzing the theoretical basis for the design of the rehearing reasons, it shoud be known that the only reason for the remand for retrial is the violation of legal procedure by the first trial, and the unclear fact-finding in the trial should not be alone regarded as the retrial reason. The design of retrial reason stipulated in Article 170 of the Civil Procedure Law goes against the legal principle of lawsuit and is short of legitimacy. When designing the reasons for retrial, the serious breach of procedural law and the general breach of procedural law should be distinguished; the former is the absolute reason for remand, while the latter is illegal and become the reason for retrial only when it would affect the judgment and to maintain the trial level system becomes necessary.

Key words: procedural illegality; remand for retrial; fair trial; interest at the trial level