Contemporary Finance & Economics ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 127-139.
• Business Administration • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yu Jiang1, Xu Sheng2
Received:2024-10-08
Revised:2025-04-18
Published:2026-01-19
CLC Number:
Yu Jiang, Xu Sheng. The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Perceived Non-Compliant Tasks on Employees' Job Crafting Behavior[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2026, 0(1): 127-139.
| [1] 高枫, 罗文豪, 王满意. 柔性人力资源管理何以驱动员工自我领导——基于动态地位的视角[J]. 当代财经, 2024, (7): 104-115. [2] 郝夏靓, 陈毅文. 不合规任务与知识隐藏的关系研究——基于双过程模型和量子型领导视角[J].技术经济与管理研究, 2023, (10): 75-80. [3] 姜福斌, 王震. 压力认知评价理论在管理心理学中的应用: 场景, 方式与迷思[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, (12): 2825-2845. [4] 李朋波, 高静, 黄子欣, 等. 心理契约视角下不合规任务对员工离职倾向的影响机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2023, (5): 705-714. [5] 李朋波, 陈涛, 黄子欣, 等. 不合规任务对酒店员工退缩行为的影响机制: 一个被调节的链式中介模型[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, (4): 99-118. [6] 李燕萍, 李皓璇. 固步自封还是开拓进取?员工工作反刍对其反馈寻求策略的影响机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, (17): 139-149. [7] 刘军, 王琦琦, 范雪灵. 应对不合规任务: 公正敏感性和成长需求的作用[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2019, (6): 126-152. [8] 王鉴忠, 谢俊蒙, 曹振杰. 不合规任务情境下员工保持主动行为的心理机制研究:成长型心智模式的作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2025, (2): 24-36. [9] 王淑红, 胡芊郁, 张利闪. 不合规任务对工作投入的双刃剑效应研究[J]. 技术经济, 2023, (2): 166-175. [10] 占小军, 王涛. 顾客不文明行为对旁观者同事的影响:幸灾乐祸还是情绪支持[J]. 当代财经, 2023, (4): 80-92. [11] 张少峰, 陈於婷, 周梦瑶, 等. 不合规任务对员工创新行为的作用机制——基于工作投入与工作倦怠二元路径视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025, (14): 150-160. [12] 邹艳春, 章惠敏, 彭坚, 等. 变革还是拖延?员工对不合规任务的差异化应对[J]. 心理学报, 2023, (9): 1529-1541. [13] Achnak S, Vantilborgh T.Do individuals combine different coping strategies to manage their stress in the aftermath of psychological contract breach over time? A longitudinal study[J/OL]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2021, 131: 103651. [14] Ahmed S, Eatough E, Ford M.Relationships between illegitimate tasks and change in work-family outcomes via interactional justice and negative emotions[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2018, 104: 14-30. [15] Baruch Y, Holtom B C.Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research[J]. Human Relations, 2008, 61(8): 1139-1160. [16] Cheng B, Chen M Y, Dong Y.To be adaptive or not? Investigating when and how illegitimate tasks promote versus inhibit employee adaptive performance[J]. Personnel Review, 2025, 54(2): 515-537. [17] Cropley M, Michalianou G, Pravettoni G, et al.The relation of post-work ruminative thinking with eating behaviour[J]. Stress and Health, 2012, 28(1): 23-30. [18] Dawson K M, O’brien K E, Beehr T A.The role of hindrance stressors in the job demand-control-support model of occupational stress: A proposed theory revision[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016, 37(3): 397-415. [19] Ding H E, Kuvaas B.Illegitimate tasks: A systematic literature review and agenda for future research[J]. Work & Stress, 2023, 37(3): 397-420. [20] Fuller J B, Hester M K.Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(8): 1089-1120. [21] He X W, Zheng Y J, Wei Y.The double-edged sword effect of illegitimate tasks on employee creativity: Positive and negative coping perspectives[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2024, 17: 485-500. [22] Jiang F, Wang Z, Zhang M.Proactive aggression or passive resistance: A face perspective on why and how illegitimate tasks elicit various counterproductive work behaviours in employees[J/OL]. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2025, 28: e70004. [23] Kinnunen U, Feldt T, Sianoja M.et al.Identifying long-term patterns of work-related rumination: Associations with job demands and well-being outcomes[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2017, 26(4): 514-526. [24] Lazarus R S, Folkman S.Stress, appraisal, and coping[M]. New York: Springer, 1984. [25] Liang J, Farh C I C, Farh J L. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(1): 71-92. [26] Ma Q, Xie Y X.The effects of illegitimate tasks on task crafting and cyberloafing: The role of stress mindset and stress appraisal[J/OL]. Behavioral Sciences, 2024, 14(7): 600. [27] Mischel W, Shoda Y.A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure[J]. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(2): 246-268. [28] Pindek S, Demirciolu E, Howard D J, et al.Illegitimate tasks are not created equal: Examining the effects of attributions on unreasonable and unnecessary tasks[J]. Work & Stress, 2019, 33(3): 231-246. [29] Preacher K J, Hayes A F.Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2008, 40(3): 879-891. [30] Querstret D, Cropley M.Exploring the relationship between work-related rumination, sleep quality, and work-related fatigue[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2012, 17(3): 341-353. [31] Semmer N K, Tschan F, Meier L L, et al.Illegitimate tasks and counterproductive work behavior[J]. Applied Psychology, 2010, 59(1): 70-96. [32] Tims M, Bakker A B, Derks D.Development and Validation of the Job Crafting Scale[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012, 80(1): 173-186. [33] Vahle-Hinz T, Mauno S, Bloom D J.et al.Rumination for innovation? Analysing the longitudinal effects of work-related rumination on creativity at work and off-job recovery[J]. Work & Stress, 2017, 31(4): 315-337. [34] Wang Z, Jiang F B.It is not only what you do, but why you do it: The role of attribution in employees’ emotional and behavioral responses to illegitimate tasks[J/OL]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2023, 142: 103860. [35] West S G, Aiken L S, Krull J L.Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions[J]. Journal of Personality, 1996, 64(1): 1-48. [36] Xu A J, Loi R, Chow C W C. Does taking charge help or harm employees’ promotability and visibility? An investigation from supervisors’status perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2023, 108(1): 53-71. [37] Yang J, Han J, Huang S L, et al.To leave or to stay? Research on the double-edged sword effect of illegitimate tasks on employee turnover intention[J/OL]. Psychological Reports, 2024: 332941241293664. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||