Progress, Regional Differences, and Promotion Strategies of China's New Industrialization

Abstract

Abstract: New industrialization is the core component and driving force for building a modern industrial system and a powerful modern socialist country. Facing the realistic background of profound changes in the major domestic and international situations, the connotation of new industrialization has taken on new characteristics. This paper constructs a new industrialization index system from six dimensions: people orientation, quality priority, independent innovation, green and low-carbon, digital and real integration, and open and circulation, and evaluates the new industrialization development level of each region during the“13th Five-Year Plan”period. The findings show that during the “13th Five-Year Plan”period, China's new industrialization development level has continued to improve as a whole, but the regional differences are obvious and there is a trend of expansion. Among them, the eastern region is the most important source of the promotion of the level of new industrialization. The results of industrial green and low-carbon transformation are obvious, but there is an expanding trend among the regions; the integration of the digital and the real is insufficient to support the new industrialization, and there are also significant regional differences. The results show that the regional differences in the new industrialization index mainly come from inter-regional differences. The overall regional differences in the independent innovation index are relatively the largest, which is an important focus to promote regional new industrialization synergy in the future. The digital development is undergoing regional differentiation, to which attention should be paid. The flow of cross-regional factors is not smooth, and there is still an obvious problem of regional market segmentation. In the process of promoting the new industrialization and the coordinated regional development, it is required to pay attention to the efficient collaboration between the two.

Key words: new industrialization, regional differences, green and low-carbon, digitization, Dagum gini coefficient method

CLC Number:

F427

LI Peng, JIANG Mei-qin. Progress, Regional Differences, and Promotion Strategies of China's New Industrialization[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2024, 0(5): 3-16.

References

[1] 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组. 新型工业化内涵特征、体系构建与实施路径[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (3): 5-19.
[2] 郭熙保. 中国共产党工业化道路理论的学理性探析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, (1): 19-33.
[3] 李晓华, 沈继楼. 中国共产党领导下的百年工业化:历程、经验与展望[J]. 当代财经, 2021, (12): 3-14.
[4] 郭克莎. 中国工业化的进程、问题与出路[J]. 中国社会科学, 2000, (3): 60-71.
[5] 刘世锦. 正确理解“新型工业化”[J]. 中国工业经济, 2005, (11): 5-9.
[6] 陈佳贵, 黄群慧, 钟宏武. 中国地区工业化进程的综合评价和特征分析[J]. 经济研究, 2006, (6): 4-15.
[7] 唐浩. 中国特色新型工业化的新认识[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014, (6): 5-17.
[8] 王雷. 新时期中国特色新型工业化的内涵及推进路径[J]. 中国发展观察, 2020, (24): 12-16.
[9] 李德轩, 许召元, 柯俊强. 新阶段我国新型工业化发展的若干思考[J]. 理论探索, 2023, (1): 98-105.
[10] 师博, 方嘉辉. 数字经济赋能中国式新型工业化的理论内涵、实践取向与政策体系[J]. 人文杂志, 2023, (1): 7-12.
[11] 史丹. 绿色发展与全球工业化的新阶段:中国的进展与比较[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, (10): 5-18.
[12] 张琳, 邱少华. 新型工业化、信息化、城镇化和农业现代化协调发展评价研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2014, (4): 124-129.
[13] 杜传忠,姜莹. 数字技术对制造业创新效率的影响机制与效应研究[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, (3): 71-82.
[14] 董志勇,李成明. 党的百年科技创新理论探索历程、实践经验与新时代政策导向[J]. 理论学刊,2022, (5):49-57.
[15] 王展祥. 发达国家去工业化比较及其对当前中国的启示——以英国和美国为例[J]. 当代财经, 2015, (11): 3-13.
[16] 盛朝迅. 新发展格局下推进新型工业化的时代特征、目标要求与发展路径[J]. 中国发展观察, 2022, (6): 71-75.
[17] 张军, 吴桂英, 张吉鹏. 中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J]. 经济研究, 2004, (10): 35-44.
[18] Hamilton J.D. Why You Should Never Use the Hodrick-Prescott Filter[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2018, 100(5): 831-843.
[19] 余东华, 张昆. 要素市场分割、产业结构趋同与制造业高级化[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2020, (1):36-47.
[20] Quah D.T. Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 1997, 2(1): 27-59.