当代财经 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 18-27.

• 中国自主知识体系构建 • 上一篇    下一篇

交易成本视域下工业互联网企业的分类治理

杨继东1, 吴海军2, 杨登宇1   

  1. 1.中国人民大学 经济学院,北京 100872;
    2.中国社会科学院 工业经济研究所,北京 100006
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-26 修回日期:2025-08-25 发布日期:2026-01-19
  • 通讯作者: 杨登宇,中国人民大学博士研究生,主要从事企业理论与数字经济研究,联系方式 rucyang2020@163.com。
  • 作者简介:杨继东,中国人民大学教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事应用微观与土地出让研究;吴海军,中国社会科学院副研究员,硕士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事产业经济与企业创新研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“土地出让市场化对新时代制造业转型升级的影响研究”(23CJL010); 国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国产业未来发展新赛道新优势研究”(24&ZD071); 成都市哲学社会科学规划重大项目“成都加快壮大战略性新兴产业集群,培育经济增长点研究”(2025SKGHZD004); 中国社会科学院学科建设“登峰战略”资助计划项目(DF2023YS25)

Classified Governance of Industrial Internet Enterprises from the Perspective of Transaction Costs

Yang Ji-dong1, Wu Hai-jun2, Yang Deng-yu1   

  1. 1. Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    2. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100006, China
  • Received:2025-05-26 Revised:2025-08-25 Published:2026-01-19

摘要: 工业互联网企业的治理效能是制约其价值释放的核心环节,然而既有文献多关注工业互联网企业的经济贡献,缺乏对其治理机制的微观理论剖析。基于交易成本理论,在分析工业互联网企业交易特征的基础上,考察了不同类型工业互联网企业的治理结构与发展模式。研究发现,工业互联网企业的异质性交易特征决定了其多元化的治理逻辑:资产专用性高、不确定性强且交易频率高的基础设施运营企业更适用关系型契约治理机制;资产专用性低、不确定性弱且交易频率低的平台企业则更适配市场合约制;兼具基础设施运营和平台企业特点的企业,混合制是更优的治理机制。进一步,不同的治理结构需匹配差异化的发展模式。关系型契约治理机制更适合龙头企业发展模式,市场合约制下的各类企业联合发展模式更优,混合制下的工业互联网企业可以选择工业互联网园区的生态发展模式,在园区内形成相互依存的生态系统。基于上述结论,政府应通过完善法律与标准体系、强化知识产权与数据安全保障、推动产学研协同创新以及人才培养,构建有利于工业互联网基础设施运营企业、平台企业与联网工业企业协同发展的制度与创新生态。

关键词: 工业互联网, 治理机制, 交易成本

Abstract: The governance effectiveness of industrial internet enterprises is a core factor constraining the release of their values. However, the existing research literature primarily focuses on the economic contributions of industrial internet enterprises and lacks micro-level theoretical analysis of their governance mechanisms. Based on the transaction cost theory and by analyzing the transaction characteristics of industrial internet enterprises, this paper examines the governance structures and development models of different types of industrial internet enterprises. The findings reveal that the heterogeneous transaction characteristics of industrial internet enterprises determine their diverse governance logics: the infrastructure operation enterprises with high asset specificity, strong uncertainty, and high transaction frequency are more suited to a relational contract governance mechanism; the platform enterprises with lower asset specificity, weaker uncertainty, and lower transaction frequency are better adapted to a market contract mechanism; for the enterprises that combine the characteristics of both infrastructure operation and platform businesses, a hybrid mechanism serves as a more optimal governance mechanism. Furthermore, different governance structures require differentiated development models. The relational contract governance mechanism is more suitable for a development model led by leading enterprises, while a joint development model involving various enterprises under market contracts proves more effective. For the industrial Internet enterprises under a hybrid model, an ecological development model can be adopted in the industrial internet park, fostering an interdependent ecosystem within the park. Based on these findings, the government should improve the legal and standard systems, strengthen intellectual property and data-security protection, promote collaborative innovation among industries, academia and research institutions, and enhance talent development, thereby building an institutional and innovative ecosystem that supports the coordinated development of infrastructure operators, platform enterprises, and networked industrial enterprises.

Key words: industrial internet, governance mechanisms, transaction costs

中图分类号: