医疗服务业与医药制造业发展耦合协调度的测度及影响因素

当代财经 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 113-123.

医疗服务业与医药制造业发展耦合协调度的测度及影响因素

陶春海^a, 胡萌^a, 史言信^b

江西财经大学 a.统计学院; b.产业经济研究院,江西南昌 330013

收稿日期:2020-11-17 修回日期:2021-01-30 出版日期:2021-02-15 发布日期:2021-03-16
通讯作者: 胡萌,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事卫生统计研究,联系方式humeng66@foxmail.com。
作者简介:陶春海,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事卫生统计研究;史言信,江西财经大学研究员,博士,主要从事产业经济学研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点项目“资源错配视角下我国医药制造业集聚的区域经济增长效应测度研究”（20ATJ003）; 深圳市哲学社会科学规划项目“资源错配视角下深圳生物医药产业集聚的区域经济增长效应测度研究”（SZ2020B017）

On the Measurement of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Development between the Medical Services and the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Influencing Factors

TAO Chun-hai, HU Meng, SHI Yan-xin

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China

Received:2020-11-17 Revised:2021-01-30 Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-03-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于耦合协调度模型,通过构建耦合协调度评价指标体系,测度我国除港澳台地区以外的31个省（直辖市、自治区）医疗服务业与医药制造业发展耦合协调度,并在对比分析医疗服务业和医药制造业发展水平对耦合协调度影响的基础上,采用分别纳入地理矩阵与嵌套矩阵的空间杜宾模型,探究医疗服务业与医药制造业发展耦合协调度的影响因素及其空间溢出效应。研究结果表明：自新医改以来,我国政府卫生投入的增加推动了医疗服务业迅猛发展,而医药制造业发展水平相对缓慢,从而导致我国医疗服务业与医药制造业耦合协调发展为初级耦合协调。固定资本投入、知识创新对本地区医疗服务业与医药制造业发展耦合协调度具有正向影响,而协同集聚、政府扶持、外商投资具有负向影响,以上各因素对邻近地区医疗服务业与医药制造业发展耦合协调度均具有正向影响。

关键词: 医疗服务业, 医药制造业, 耦合协调度, 溢出效应

Abstract: Based on the coupling coordination degree model (CCDM), this paper firstly measures the coupling coordination degree of the development of the medical service industry and the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry in China’s 31 provinces except for Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan by constructing an index system of coupling coordination degree. Then on the basis of a contrastive analysis of the impact of the development level of the two industries on the coupling coordination degree, it explores the affecting factors on the coupling coordination degree of the two industries and its spatial spillover effect by employing the spatial Dubin model (SDM) that incorporates the geographic matrix and the nested matrix respectively. The findings show that, since China’s new health care reform, the increase of government health investment has promoted the rapid development of the medical service industry, while the development of the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry has been relatively slow. Thus the coupling coordinated development of the two industries remains at a primary coupling coordination stage. Fixed capital investment and knowledge innovation have a positive effect on the degree of coupling coordinated development between the local pharmaceutical manufacturing industry and the medical service industry, while collaborative aggregation, government support and foreign investment have a negative role in it. The aforementioned factors all have a positive effect on the degree of coupling coordination of the development of the two industries in the neighboring regions.

Key words: medical services, pharmaceutical industry, coupling coordination degree, spillover effect

中图分类号:

R197.1
F426

陶春海, 胡萌, 史言信. 医疗服务业与医药制造业发展耦合协调度的测度及影响因素[J]. 当代财经, 2021, 0(2): 113-123.

TAO Chun-hai, HU Meng, SHI Yan-xin. On the Measurement of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Development between the Medical Services and the Pharmaceutical Industry and the Influencing Factors[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2021, 0(2): 113-123.

参考文献

[1] 李宁,韩同银.京津冀生产性服务业与制造业协同发展实证研究[J].城市发展研究,2018,(9):22-28.
[2] Ellison G.,Glaeser E.L.Geographic Concentration in US Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach[J].Journal of Political Economy,1997,105(5): 889-927.
[3] 张虎,韩爱华,杨青龙.中国制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚的空间效应分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017,(2):3-20.
[4] 张虎,周楠.制造业与服务业协调发展及影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2019,(11):86-90.
[5] 陈晓峰,邢建国.集群内外耦合治理与地方产业集群升级——基于家纺产业集群的例证[J].当代财经,2013,(1):102-110.
[6] Francois J.,Woerz J.Producer Services,Manufacturing Linkages,andTrade[R].Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI2007-04512,2007.
[7] Xing L.,Xue M.,Hu M.Dynamic Simulation and Assessment of the Coupling Coordination Degree of the Economy-Resource-Environment System: Case of Wuhan City in China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2019,230(15): 474-487.
[8] 唐晓华,张欣珏,李阳.中国制造业与生产性服务业动态协调发展实证研究[J].经济研究,2018,(3):79-93.
[9] Kelle M.Crossing Industry Borders: German Manufacturersas Services Exporters[J].World Economy,2012,26(12):1494-1515.
[10] Li B.The Interaction of Clusters between Manufacturing and Producer Services in China[J].Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja,2017,30(1): 1427-1442.
[11] Arnold J.,Javorcik B.,Mattoo A.The Productivity Effects of Services Liberalization: Evidence from the Czech Republic[R].World Bank working paper,2006.
[12] 张虎,周楠.制造业与服务业协调发展及影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2019,(11):86-90.
[13] 刘佳,代明,易顺.先进制造业与现代服务业融合:实现机理及路径选择[J].学习与实践,2014,(6):23-34.
[14] 张虎,韩爱华.制造业与生产性服务业耦合能否促进空间协调——基于285个城市数据的检验[J].统计研究,2019,(1):41-52.
[15] 胡元瑞,田成志,吕萍.产业转型升级与新型城镇化建设的时空耦合效应机理与实证研究[J].工业技术经济,2020,(9):80-87.
[16] Anselin L.,Le Gallo J.,Jayet H.Spatial Panel Econometrics[M]//Matyas L.,Dordrecht P.S.The Econometrics of Panel Data.Berlin,Heidelberg: Springer,2008: 625-660.
[17] Anselin L.,Bera A.K.Spatial dependence in Linear regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics[M]//Ziegel E.R.,Ullah A.,Giles D.E.A.Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics,New York: Marcel Dekker,1998: 237-289.
[18] 袁华锡,刘耀彬,胡森林.产业集聚加剧了环境污染吗?——基于外商直接投资视角[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,(4):58-68.
[19] 余泳泽,刘大勇,宣烨.生产性服务业集聚对制造业生产效率的外溢效应及其衰减边界——基于空间计量模型的实证分析[J].金融研究,2016,(2):23-36.
[20] 刘耀彬,袁华锡,封亦代.产业集聚减排效应的空间溢出与门槛特征[J].数理统计与管理,2018,(2):224-234.