当代财经 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (04): 141-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

技术进步过程中银行业结构边际效应演化分析

王柄权,李国平,郝威亚   

  1. (西安交通大学 经济与金融学院,陕西 西安 710061)
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-21 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:王柄权,西安交通大学博士研究生,主要从事新结构经济学研究,通讯作者联系方式wang20062693@163.com;李国平,西安交通大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事区域经济研究;郝威亚,西安交通大学博士研究生,主要从事企业创新研究。

An Analysis of Evolving Marginal Effect of Banking Structure in the Process of Technological Progress

WANG Bing-quan, LI Guo-ping, HAO Wei-ya   

  1. (Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)
  • Received:2017-09-21 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 银行体系能否有效支持技术创新,是我国转变经济发展方式的关键。从理论上分析,在低技术水平阶段,推动技术进步的方式主要为引进并模仿国外的先进技术,信息较为透明且银行面临的风险较低,银行业竞争有助于降低信贷成本进而提高信贷可得性,增加企业从事创新活动的激励;在高技术水平阶段,推动技术进步的方式主要是通过研发创新,由于研发创新的高度不确定性,银行面临的风险较高,唯有通过其市场势力分享创新企业的研发收益才能使收益与风险相匹配,进而增强银行对企业创新活动的贷款意愿。因此,最优银行业结构应随技术进步而偏向于垄断。实证研究表明:在我国低技术水平阶段,银行业集中度的提高不利于技术进步;随着我国技术水平的不断进步,银行业集中度对技术进步的促进作用由负转正并不断增强。理论和实证研究皆表明,银行业结构并不存在优劣之分,关键在于银行业结构与技术水平是否相匹配。

关键词: 银行业结构,技术进步,边际效应,面板分位数回归

Abstract: Whether the banking system can effectively support technological innovation is the key to China’s transformation of the mode of economic development. A theoretical analysis can see that at the stage of lower technological level, the major way to push technical progress is to introduce and imitate foreign advanced technologies, of which the information is rather transparent and the banks are faced with lower risks. The banking competition is conductive to lowering the credit costs and improving the credit availability, thus the incentive can be increased for enterprises to be engaged in the innovation activities. While at the stage of higher technological level, the way to push technical progress is mainly through R&D innovation. Due to higher uncertainty of R&D innovation, banks are faced with higher risks. Only through its market power to share the R&D earnings of the innovative enterprises, can the earnings match the risks, so as to enhance banks’ willingness to lend to the enterprises’ innovative activities. Therefore, the optimal banking structure should be in favor of monopoly with the technological progress. The empirical study shows that at the stage of lower technology level in China, the improvement of banking concentration is not conducive to technological progress; with the continuous progress of China’s technology, the impact of the concentration degree of the banking industry on technical progress will turn from negative into positive and get stronger. Both theoretical and empirical studies show that there is no difference between the so called good or bad banking structure, the key lies in the matching of the banking structure to the technologic level.

Key words: banking structure; technical progress; marginal effect; panel quartile regression