当代财经 ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (06): 563-.

• • 上一篇    

财政分权、空间外溢与中国城市雾霾污染:机理与证据

李根生,韩民春   

  1. (华中科技大学 经济学院,湖北 武汉 430074)
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-13 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:李根生,华中科技大学博士研究生,主要从事产业经济与国际贸易研究,联系方式lgsheng2007@163.com;韩民春,华中科技大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事产业经济与国际贸易研究。

Fiscal Decentralization, Spatial Spillover and China’s Urban Haze Pollution: Mechanism and Evidences

LI Gen-sheng, HAN Min-chun   

  1. (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)
  • Received:2014-12-13 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 近年来,中国各大城市相继遭受严重的雾霾污染,严重威胁到城市居民的身体健康和经济的可持续发展。基于财政分权引致的地方政府行为模式的变化和污染空间溢出效应的分析,利用中国2003-2012年29个大中城市PM10面板数据的实证结果表明,财政自主度的提高可以激励地方政府加大对雾霾污染的治理力度,而内生于财政分权的地方政府竞争则削弱了这种激励作用;城市周边区域的污染溢出和工业化则进一步助推了雾霾的生成。进一步按重度与轻度污染区域分析发现,城市雾霾形成原因呈现出显著的地域差异性,因而雾霾治理既要因地制宜又要联防联控。

关键词: 财政分权,城市雾霾污染,地方政府竞争,污染空间外溢

Abstract: In recent years, China’s large cities are suffering serious haze pollution one after another, which is threatening the health of urban residents and the sustainable development of economy. Based on the analysis of the changes of local government behavior patterns resulted from fiscal decentralization and the effect of spatial pollution spillover, this paper conducts an empirical test by making use of the PM10 panel data of China’s 29 large and medium cities from 2003 to 2012. The results show that the rising of fiscal autonomy can stimulate local governments to strengthen their governance of haze pollution, while the competition between local governments resulted from fiscal decentralization can weaken this kind of stimulating effect; the pollution spillover at the neighboring areas of cities and industrialization would further boost the formation of haze. Further analysis according to the regional heaviness and mildness of pollution shows that regional differences are obvious in the process of haze formation, so that the most effective method dealing with haze pollution is to adjust measures according to local conditions and to coordinate their efforts in prevention and control of the pollution.

Key words: fiscal decentralization; urban haze pollution; local government competition; spatial pollution spillover