贸易自由化与中国制造企业服务化

当代财经 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 112-123.

贸易自由化与中国制造企业服务化

肖挺, 黄先明

江西财经大学国际经贸学院,江西南昌 330013

收稿日期:2020-07-24 出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-01-19
通讯作者: 黄先明,江西财经大学教授,博士,主要从事国际贸易研究,联系方式jxufehxm@126.com。
作者简介:肖挺,江西财经大学副教授,博士,主要从事国际商务与企业商业模式创新研究,联系方式ncu_xiao@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“组织生态视角下制造企业进入退出服务化种群影响因素的实证研究”(71762012); 江西省社会科学“十三五”规划项目“制造企业‘服务化困境’成因的多角度研究: 作用机理与定量评估”(18YJ12); 江西省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目“制造业服务化-绩效悖论成因及作用机理的论证分析”（GL19109）; 国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国战略性三稀矿产资源供给风险治理机制研究”（19ZDA111）

Trade Liberalization and Servitization of China’s Manufacturing Enterprises

XIAO Ting, HUANG Xian-ming

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China

Received:2020-07-24 Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-01-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在国际贸易自由化的背景下,我国企业面临着较大的生存压力。探讨企业在这种贸易环境下生存发展的一种途径,即在其业务结构中增加服务供应的比重,从而更好地适应市场的变化,这被称为制造业的服务化。利用上市制造企业数据的计量结果表明,较低的制造业进口关税导致企业从商品生产转向服务供应,贸易自由化推动并实现了我国企业转型。而通过机制分析还发现,在关税降低的背景下,制造企业将其生产活动进行海外外包并非是其实现服务化转型的关键,企业研发能力的打造才是贸易自由化背景下推动企业业务模式变革的重要影响因素,由于研发强度本身就是企业比较优势的来源,因此这也符合“赫克歇尔-俄林”的理论机制。

关键词: 制造业服务化, 贸易自由化, "赫克歇尔-俄林"理论, 外包, 研发能力

Abstract: In the context of international trade liberalization, China’s enterprises are facing greater pressure of survival. This paper explores a way for enterprises to survive and develop in this kind of trading environment, that is, to increase the proportion of service supply in their business structure, so as to better adapt to market changes, which is called the servitization of manufacturing industry. The results of the measurement based on the data of the listed manufacturing enterprises show that the lower import tariff of the manufacturing industry causes enterprises to shift from commodity production to service supply, and the trade liberalization promotes and realizes the transformation of Chinese enterprises. It is also found through a mechanism analysis that, under the background of tariff reduction, the manufacturing industry outsourcing its production activities to foreign countries is not the key to realize its transformation of servitization, nothing but the cultivation of enterprises’ R&D ability is the important influencing factor to promote the reform of enterprise business modes under the background of trade liberalization. Because the R&D strength itself is the source of the enterprise comparative advantages, this also conforms to the mechanism of Heckscher-Ohlin theory.

Key words: servitization of manufacturing industry, trade liberalization, Heckscher-Ohlin Theory, outsourcing, R&D ability

中图分类号:

F752.6
F425

肖挺, 黄先明. 贸易自由化与中国制造企业服务化[J]. 当代财经, 2021, 0(1): 112-123.

XIAO Ting, HUANG Xian-ming. Trade Liberalization and Servitization of China’s Manufacturing Enterprises[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2021, 0(1): 112-123.

参考文献

[1] 易靖韬,蔡菲莹. 企业创新与贸易方式转型:知识产权保护和贸易自由化的调节作用[J]. 中国软科学,2019,(11):119-128.
[2] 许家云,毛其淋,胡鞍钢. 中间品进口与企业出口产品质量升级:基于中国证据的研究[J]. 世界经济,2017,(3):52-75.
[3] Mayer T., Melitz M.J., Ottaviano G. I. P. Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(2):495-536.
[4] 夏秋,胡昭玲. 制造业投入服务化能提高全要素生产率吗——基于成本和风险的视角[J]. 当代财经,2018,(7):99-111.
[5] 章韬,李世林,孙元. 贸易自由化是否影响中国企业垂直一体化?[J]. 世界经济研究,2019,(2):49-60+136.
[6] Crozet M., Milet E.Should Everybody be in Services? The Effect of Servitization on Manufacturing Firm Performance[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2017, 36(5): 1-22.
[7] Neely A.Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of Manufacturing[J]. Operations Management Research, 2008, 1(2): 103-118.
[8] Visnjic I., Van Looy B., Neely A.Steering Manufacturing Firms Towards Service Business Model Innovation: Embracing Indicators that Reflect Market Performance[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014, 56(1): 100-123.
[9] 肖挺. 制造企业服务化商业模式与产品创新投入的协同效应检验——“服务化悖论”的一种解释[J]. 管理评论,2019,(7):274-285.
[10] Bernard A.B., Bradford J. J., Schott P. K. Trade Costs, Firms and Productivity[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2006, 53(5): 917-937.
[11] 吕越,黄艳希,陈勇兵. 全球价值链嵌入的生产率效应:影响与机制分析[J]. 世界经济,2017,(7):28-51.
[12] 刘志彪,张杰. 从融入全球价值链到构建国家价值链:中国产业升级的战略思考[J]. 学术月刊,2009,(9):59-68.
[13] Bustos P. Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms[J]. American Economic Review, 2011, 101(2): 304-340.
[14] Bernard A.B., Valerie S., Frederic W. Rethinking Deindustrialization[J]. Economic Policy, 2017, 32(89): 5-38.
[15] Breinlich H., Soderbery A., Wright G.C. From Selling Goods to Selling Services: Firm Responses to Trade Liberalization[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2017, 10(4):79-108.
[16] Blanchard P., Fuss C., Mathieu C.Why Do Manufacturing Firms Produce Services? Evidence for the Servitization Paradox in Belgium[R]. National Bank of Belgium Working Paper 330, 2017.
[17] Crozet M., Trionfetti F.Firm-level Comparative Advantage[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2013, 91(2):321-328.
[18] Crinò R.Offshoring, Multinationals and Labour Market: A Review of the Empirical Literature[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2009, 23(2):197-249.
[19] Bloom N., Romer P.M., Terry S. J., Van Reenen. J. A Trapped-Factors Model of Innovation[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 103(3): 208-213.
[20] Ackerberg D.A., Kevin C., Garth F. Identification Properties of Recent Production Function Estimators[J]. Econometrica, 2015, 83(6): 2411-2451.
[21] 彭书舟,李小平,牛晓迪. 进口贸易自由化是否影响了企业产出波动?[J]. 财经研究,2020,(4):125-139.
[22] Head K., Mayer T.Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook[J]. Handbook of International Economics, 2014, 4(2): 131-195.
[23] Chakraborty P., Raveh O.Input-trade Liberalization and the Demand for Managers Evidence from India[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2018, 111(1): 159-176.
[24] 解季非. 制造企业服务化路径选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2018,(12):135-145.
[25] Bernard A.B., Fort T. C. Factoryless Goods Producers in the US[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 19396, 2013.
[26] 王厚双,盛新宇. 服务化对制造业产品出口价格的影响分析[J]. 当代财经,2019,(9):95-108.