当代财经 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 38-49.

• 公共经济与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

民营企业融资被挤压与对国有企业的反向竞争

汪敏1, 陈东1,2   

  1. 1.南京大学 长江产业经济研究院,江苏 南京 210093;
    2.安徽工业大学 商学院,安徽 马鞍山 243032
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-02 修回日期:2020-09-13 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 陈 东,南京大学长江产业经济研究院特聘研究员,安徽工业大学教授,经济学博士,主要从事民营经济和产业经济研究,联系方式njudchendong@126.com
  • 作者简介:汪 敏,南京大学长江产业经济研究院特聘研究员,经济学博士,主要从事资本市场和民营经济研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国产业创新发展战略研究”(15ZDC013);安徽省哲学社会科学规划重大项目“安徽深度融入长三角更高质量一体化发展研究”(AHSKZD2018D16);教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目“党组织嵌入对投资‘脱虚向实'的影响——基于中国民营企业理论与实证研究”(18YJC790009);安徽省自然科学基金面上项目“职能跨界视角下民营制造企业党组织对投资‘脱实向虚'影响研究”(1808085MG211)

The Squeeze on Private Enterprises' Financing and the Reverse Competition against State-Owned Enterprises

WANG Min1, CHEN Dong1,2   

  1. 1. Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093;
    2. Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243032, China
  • Received:2020-05-02 Revised:2020-09-13 Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-12-10

摘要: 通过构建一个领导者和跟随者博弈模型,诠释了国有企业和民营企业在金融市场中的竞争关系。理论研究结论表明:国有企业的融资成本主要取决于融资为其绩效增长带来的边际效应;民营企业的融资成本,一方面取决于融资为其绩效增长带来的边际效应,另一方面取决于国有企业融资是否会挤压民营企业融资空间,并形成对国有企业的反向竞争。基于国内债券市场数据的实证结果发现,民营企业融资成本显著高于国有企业。当国有企业和民营企业同时融资时,国有企业融资规模越大,民营企业融资成本越高,即形成了对民营企业的挤压效应;民营企业融资成本的增加,也会反过来提高国有企业融资成本从而形成反向竞争。民营企业可通过公募融资降低信息不对称、增加融资规模等方式降低融资成本。因此,解决民营企业融资问题需要从增加民营企业财务透明度、提高政府监管机构服务质量和优化金融机构绩效考核方式等方面入手进行政策调整。

关键词: 博弈模型, 融资, 挤压效应, 反向竞争, 民营企业

Abstract: Through constructing a game model between leaders and followers, this paper explains the competitive relationship between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises in the financial market. The conclusion of the theoretical research indicates that the financing costs of the state-owned enterprises mainly depend on the marginal effect brought by the financing on its performance growth; while the financing costs of the private enterprises depend on the marginal effect of financing for its performance growth on the one hand, and on the other hand depend on whether the financing of state-owned enterprises will squeeze the financing space of private enterprises and form the reverse competition against the state-owned enterprises. The empirical result based on the domestic bond market data shows that the financing costs of private enterprises are significantly higher than that of state-owned enterprises. When both state-owned enterprises and private enterprises obtain financing at the same time, the larger the financing scale of state-owned enterprises, the greater the financing costs of private enterprises will be, that is, a squeeze effect on private enterprises is formed. The increase in financing costs of private enterprises will in turn increase the financing costs of state-owned enterprises and form reverse competition. Private enterprises can effectively reduce their financing costs by such methods as reducing information asymmetry through public offering financing, increasing financing scale and so on. Therefore, in order to solve the financing problem of private enterprises, it is necessary to carry out policy adjustment from such aspects as increasing the financial transparency of private enterprises, improving the service quality of government regulatory agencies, optimizing the performance assessment methods of financial institutions, and so on.

Key words: game model, financing, squeeze effect, reverse competition, private enterprise

中图分类号: