绿色技术转移与地区环境污染治理

当代财经 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 125-138.

绿色技术转移与地区环境污染治理

李琳娜¹, 林红英², 王宇³, 邸洁¹

1.上海财经大学财税投资学院,上海 200433;
2.中南大学商学院,湖南长沙 410083;
3.内蒙古大学经济管理学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010021

收稿日期:2024-11-26 修回日期:2026-07-12 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-09-14
通讯作者: 王宇（1978—）,男,内蒙古呼和浩特市人,内蒙古大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事产业经济学研究,联系方式wy9230@163.com。
作者简介:李琳娜（1997—）,女,内蒙古巴彦淖尔市人,上海财经大学博士研究生,主要从事创新经济学研究;林红英（1996—）,女,广西桂林人,中南大学博士研究生,主要从事创新网络与绿色技术创新扩散研究;邸洁（1997—）,女,山东日照人,上海财经大学博士研究生,主要从事财税政策研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“碳配额政策对黄河几字弯生态脆弱区生态风险的影响研究”（72163023）; 内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目“碳税启征视角下黄河几字弯生态安全格局演化及提升路径研究”（2023JQ05）; 内蒙古自治区青年科技英才项目（NJYT23121）

Green Technology Transfer and Regional Environmental Pollution Control

Li Lin-na¹, Lin Hong-ying², Wang Yu³, Di Jie¹

1. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China;
2. Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China;
3. Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China

Received:2024-11-26 Revised:2026-07-12 Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在建设全国一体化技术要素市场的背景下,借助市场机制促进绿色技术的扩散与应用,已经成为推动地区环境污染治理和绿色转型的关键路径。基于2006—2022年中国地级市绿色专利转让数据,运用双重固定效应模型、工具变量和词频统计等方法,系统检验绿色技术转移对地区环境污染治理的影响及其作用机制,并从绿色技术转移的全周期视角,提出破解绿色技术转移瓶颈的路径选择。研究表明,跨区域绿色技术转移能够显著提升技术接收地区的环境污染治理水平。机制分析表明,绿色技术转移通过资源配置效应和自主创新效应两条路径提升了地区的环境治理效能,前者表现为清洁技术要素结构的优化重组,后者表现为本地绿色创新能力的提升。基于绿色技术转移“需求—过程—应用”全周期的分析表明,随着区域环境保护重视程度的提高、社会支撑条件的改善以及技术承接能力的增强,绿色技术转移对环境污染治理水平提升的促进作用显著增强。因此,应着力健全绿色技术市场机制、强化区域创新能力并构建全周期保障体系,以有效促进“技术转移—环境治理—绿色发展”的良性循环。

关键词: 要素市场一体化, 绿色技术转移, 环境污染治理, 专利转让, 自主创新

Abstract: Against the backdrop of building a nationally integrated market for technology factors, promoting the diffusion and application of green technologies through market mechanisms has become a critical pathway for strengthening regional environmental pollution control and advancing the green transition. Using green patent transfer data for Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2006 to 2022, this study systematically examines the impact of green technology transfer on regional environmental pollution control and its underlying mechanisms through two-way fixed-effects models, instrumental-variable methods, and word-frequency analysis. It further proposes pathways for overcoming bottlenecks in green technology transfer from a full-cycle perspective. The results show that green technology transfer significantly improves regional environmental pollution control, and this finding remains robust after a series of robustness checks. Mechanism analysis indicates that green technology transfer improves regional environmental pollution control through two channels. The resource allocation effect is reflected in the optimized allocation and restructuring of green technological resources, while the indigenous innovation effect is reflected in the enhancement of local green innovation capacity. A full-cycle analysis of green technology transfer covering demand, process, and application further shows that its positive effect on environmental pollution control becomes significantly stronger as regional emphasis on environmental protection increases, social support conditions improve, and technological absorptive capacity strengthens. Accordingly, efforts should be made to improve market mechanisms for green technology transactions, strengthen regional innovation capacity, and establish a full-cycle support system, thereby effectively fostering a virtuous cycle of technology transfer, environmental pollution control, and green development.

Key words: integration of factor markets, green technology transfer, environmental pollution control, patent transfer, indigenous innovation

中图分类号:

F124.3

李琳娜, 林红英, 王宇, 邸洁. 绿色技术转移与地区环境污染治理[J]. 当代财经, 2026, 0(9): 125-138.

Li Lin-na, Lin Hong-ying, Wang Yu, Di Jie. Green Technology Transfer and Regional Environmental Pollution Control[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2026, 0(9): 125-138.

参考文献

[1] 陈诗一, 陈登科. 雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J]. 经济研究, 2018, (2): 20-34.
[2] 范剑勇, 冯猛, 李方文. 产业集聚与企业全要素生产率[J]. 世界经济, 2014, (5): 51-73.
[3] 韩君, 葛春瑞. 国家低碳工业园区试点政策对企业绿色创新的影响研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2025, (3): 23-36.
[4] 雷绪斌, 王良健. 政府与公众协同环境规制对城市绿色创新的影响研究[J]. 当代财经, 2025, (8): 127-138.
[5] 刘大勇, 徐晓轩, 李妍, 等. 降低制度性交易成本如何影响城市间技术要素流转——基于政府服务与专利技术市场流动路径的分析[J]. 财经研究, 2023, (11): 110-124.
[6] 刘志彪,孔令池.从分割走向整合:推进国内统一大市场建设的阻力与对策[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (8): 20-36.
[7] 刘子怡, 王朵铎, 汪依唯. 政府预算的环境污染治理效应研究——基于预决算偏离的视角[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2023, (11): 103-116.
[8] 龙小宁, 刘灵子, 张靖. 企业合作研发模式对创新质量的影响——基于中国专利数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (10): 174-192.
[9] 罗鉴, 肖芳. 公众环境关注、绿色技术创新与企业ESG表现[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2025, (5): 23-34.
[10] 佘硕, 王巧, 张阿城. 技术创新、产业结构与城市绿色全要素生产率——基于国家低碳城市试点的影响渠道检验[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2020, (8): 44-61.
[11] 沈国兵, 黄铄珺. 城市层面知识产权保护对中国企业引进外资的影响[J]. 财贸经济, 2019, (12): 143-157.
[12] 沈坤荣, 林剑威, 傅元海. 网络基础设施建设、信息可得性与企业创新边界[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (1): 57-75.
[13] 史丹, 叶云岭, 于海潮. 双循环视角下技术转移对产业升级的影响研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, (6): 5-26.
[14] 孙博文, 郑世林. 环境规制的减污降碳协同效应——来自清洁生产标准实施的准自然实验[J]. 经济学 (季刊), 2024, (2):624-642.
[15] 孙博文. 城市协同创新与绿色技术转移的互动关系:基于创新价值链循环视角[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, (1):127-138.
[16] 王宇, 李琳娜, 王鹏飞. 制度压力与企业绿色技术扩散群体行为研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2024, (5): 197-209.
[17] 王宇哲, 赵静.“用钱投票”: 公众环境关注度对不同产业资产价格的影响[J]. 管理世界, 2018, (9): 46-57.
[18] 吴虹仪, 殷德生. 专利流动与中国工业企业全要素生产率[J]. 经济管理, 2021, (4): 21-38.
[19] 吴小康, 铁瑛. 知识产品交易、边界障碍与效率损失评估[J]. 世界经济, 2023, (10): 170-195.
[20] 袁礼, 周正. 环境权益交易市场与企业绿色专利再配置[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, (12): 127-145.
[21] 郑曼妮, 黎文靖, 谭有超. 技术转移与企业高质量创新[J]. 世界经济, 2024, (3): 66-93.
[22] Banerjee A, Duflo E, Qian N.On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China[J/OL]. Journal of Development Economics, 2020, 145: 102442.
[23] Buntaine M T, Greenstone M, He G, et al.Does the squeaky wheel get more grease? The direct and indirect effects of citizen participation on environmental governance in China[J]. American Economic Review, 2024, 114(3): 815-850.
[24] Comin D, Mestieri M.If technology has arrived everywhere, why has income diverged?[J]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2018, 10(3): 137-178.
[25] Ferreira J J M, Fernandes C I, Veiga P M. The effects of knowledge spillovers, digital capabilities, and innovation on firm performance: A moderated mediation model[J/OL]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 200: 123086.
[26] Jin P, Mangla S K, Song M.The power of innovation diffusion: How patent transfer affects urban innovation quality[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 145: 414-425.
[27] Li J M, Dong K Y, Dong X C, et al.How green trade influences pollution emissions in China: A provincial perspective[J/OL]. Energy Economics, 2022, 115: 106330.
[28] Liu W W, Tao Y, Bi K.Capturing information on global knowledge flows from patent transfers: An empirical study using USPTO patents[J/OL]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(5): 104509.
[29] Min J W, Vonortas N S, Kim Y J.Commercialization of transferred public technologies[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 138: 10-20.
[30] Pingali P L.Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(31): 12302-12308.
[31] Scuotto V, Beatrice O, Valentina C, et al.Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer[J/OL]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 152: 119906.
[32] Wang P F, Li L N, Wang Y.The index construction and evaluation of quality of life in China and its spatial mismatch with subjective well-being: Evidence from a city-level perspective[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2023, 170(3): 955-985.
[33] Wang X, Cho S H, Scheller-Wolf A.Green technology development and adoption: Competition, regulation, and uncertainty—A global game approach[J]. Management Science, 2021, 67(1): 201-219.