当代财经 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 112-126.

• 产业与贸易 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字领域国际高标准经贸规则与数字贸易

马梦涓1, 余紫菱2, 马莉莉1   

  1. 1.西北大学 经济管理学院,陕西 西安 710127;
    2.新疆大学 经济与管理学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-15 修回日期:2025-10-06 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-26
  • 通讯作者: 余紫菱,新疆大学讲师,经济学博士,主要从事世界经济、国际贸易与环境研究,联系方式1447181128@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:马梦涓,西北大学博士研究生,主要从事世界经济、数字贸易研究;马莉莉,西北大学教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事世界经济研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“全球数字服务贸易网络演化机制与中国应对策略研究”(24CGJ029)

High-Standard International Economic and Trade Rules in the Digital Domain and Digital Trade

Ma Meng-juan1, Yu Zi-ling2, Ma Li-li1   

  1. 1. Northwest University, Xi'an 710127;
    2. Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
  • Received:2024-10-15 Revised:2025-10-06 Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-26

摘要: 加快对接数字领域国际高标准经贸规则,对于释放数字贸易增量潜力具有重要意义。使用2000—2022年区域贸易协定电子商务和数据条款数据库与联合国贸易和发展会议统计数据库,从自由贸易协定边境后条款视角出发,考察数字领域国际高标准经贸规则对数字贸易的影响。研究发现,数字领域国际高标准经贸规则对数字贸易具有显著的促进作用。其中,包容性规则对接的促进效应更为突出,约束性规则对接则呈抑制效应。其作用机制主要包括数字产业支撑效应与数字网络重构效应。异质性分析发现,数字服务条款的促进效应最强,其次为数字知识产权与数字投资条款,竞争政策条款的作用相对较弱。拓展性分析发现,不同制度整合路径对数字贸易的影响存在差异,中国、美国或中美两国共同加入《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》的促进效应尤为明显,而部分发展中国家的加入或规则整合可能对数字贸易产生抑制效应。此外,非数字领域国际高标准经贸规则通过创新要素激活效应、营商环境优化效应和人力资本适配效应等路径间接促进数字贸易发展。因此,各国应优先推动包容性规则落地,避免照搬式制度输出;同时,强化数字产业支撑能力和分层分类的接入规则,从而形成有梯度的区域规则适配路径。

关键词: 国际高标准经贸规则, 自由贸易协定边境后条款, 数字贸易

Abstract: Accelerating the alignment with high-standard international economic and trade rules in the digital domain is of great significance for releasing the growth potential of digital trade. By making use of Trade Agreements Provisions on Electronic-Commerce and Data from 2000 to 2022 and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Statistical Database, this study examines the impact of international high standard economic and trade rules in the digital field on digital trade from the perspective of post border clauses in free trade agreements. The findings show that international high standard economic and trade rules in the digital field have a significant promoting effect on digital trade. Among them, the promoting effect of inclusive rule docking is more prominent, while the restrictive rule docking presents restraining effects. Its mechanism of action mainly includes the support effect of the digital industry and the reconstruction effect of the digital network. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that the promotion effect of digital service clauses is the strongest, followed by digital intellectual property and digital investment clauses, while the role of competition policy clauses is relatively weaker. The expansion analysis reveals that there are differences in the impact of different institutional integration paths on digital trade. The promotion effect of China, the United States, or the joint accession of China and the United States to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans Pacific Partnership is particularly evident, while the accession or rule integration of some developing countries may have inhibitory effects on digital trade. In addition, international high standard economic and trade rules in the non digital field indirectly promote the development of digital trade through innovative factor activation effects, business environment optimization effects, and human capital adaptation effects. Therefore, countries should prioritize promoting the implementation of inclusive rules and avoid blindly exporting systems. At the same time, they should strengthen the support capacity of the digital industry and the access rules of hierarchical classification, thus forming a gradient based regional rule adaptation path.

Key words: high-standard international economic and trade rules, post-border provisions in free trade agreements, digital trade

中图分类号: