当代财经 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 18-30.

• 理论经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

知识产权保护、技术转移与企业持续创新

叶云岭1, 单航2, 于海潮3   

  1. 1.中国社会科学院 工业经济研究所,北京 100006;
    2.安徽大学 创新发展研究院,安徽 合肥 230031;
    3.北京工商大学 数字商科与首都发展创新中心,北京 100048
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-05 修回日期:2025-04-21 出版日期:2025-11-15 发布日期:2025-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 于海潮,北京工商大学讲师,经济学博士,主要从事数字经济研究,联系方式haichaoyu@btbuedu.cn
  • 作者简介:叶云岭,中国社会科学院助理研究员,经济学博士,主要从事区域创新研究;单航,安徽大学讲师,经济学博士,主要从事绿色发展研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中国社会科学院工业大数据联合实验室项目(2024SYZH007); 国家社会科学基金青年项目“技术转移对企业新质生产力的驱动效应、机制分析与政策优化研究”(24CJY013); 国家社会科学基金青年项目“数字技术应用对家庭绿色消费的影响机制与对策研究”(24CJY117); 中国社会科学院学科建设“登峰战略”资助计划(DF2023ZD24)

Intellectual Property Protection, Technology Transfer and Enterprise Sustainable Innovation

Ye Yun-ling, Shan Hang, Yu Hai-chao   

  1. 1. Institute of Industrial Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100006;
    2. Anhui University, Hefei 230031;
    3. Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2024-12-05 Revised:2025-04-21 Online:2025-11-15 Published:2025-11-11

摘要: 国家知识产权示范城市建设为企业持续性的创新行为提供坚实的制度保障。基于2010—2022年中国A股上市公司数据并将技术转移纳入知识产权保护与企业持续创新分析框架的实证研究表明,知识产权保护对企业持续创新投入和持续创新产出均具有显著的驱动作用;知识产权保护可以通过技术转移促进企业持续创新;知识产权保护对企业持续创新的影响具有异质性,知识产权保护促进东部、中部、西部地区企业持续创新却阻碍东北地区企业持续创新投入,知识产权保护有助于高科技企业、非国有企业持续创新却不利于非高科技企业持续创新产出。上述结论意味着,应以健全知识产权保护制度为基础,加快构建高效联动的技术转移市场,立足企业所在区域、所有制、科技属性等异质性分类施策,进而夯实企业持续创新的政策支撑体系。

关键词: 知识产权保护, 企业持续创新, 技术转移, 创新投入, 创新产出

Abstract: The construction of the national intellectual property demonstration cities provides a solid institutional foundation for enterprise sustainable innovation. An empirical study based on the data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2022 and incorporating technology transfer into the analysis framework of intellectual property protection and sustained innovation of enterprises shows that, intellectual property protection has a significant driving effect on both sustained innovation input and output of enterprises, that intellectual property protection can promote sustained innovation in enterprises through technology transfer, and that the impact of intellectual property protection on sustained innovation of enterprises is heterogeneous: the intellectual property protection promotes the sustained innovation of enterprises in the eastern, central, and western regions, but hinders the sustained innovation investment of enterprises in the northeast region; the intellectual property protection helps high-tech enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises to sustain innovation, but is not conducive to the sustained innovation output of non high-tech enterprises. The above conclusion implies that a sound intellectual property protection system should be established as the basis, and an efficient and interconnected technology transfer market should be accelerated. Policies should be classified based on the heterogeneity of the region, the ownership, and the technological attributes of the enterprises, in order to consolidate the policy support system for sustained innovation of the enterprise.

Key words: intellectual property protection, enterprise sustainable innovation, technology transfer, innovation input, innovation output

中图分类号: