企业ESG表现与绿色并购溢价：促进还是抑制

当代财经 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 139-151.

企业ESG表现与绿色并购溢价：促进还是抑制

杜心宇^1,2, 姚海鑫¹, 张晓旭³

1.辽宁大学商学院,辽宁沈阳 110136;
2.辽宁工业大学经济管理学院,辽宁锦州 121001;
3.辽宁科技大学工商管理学院,辽宁鞍山 114051

收稿日期:2024-04-26 修回日期:2024-07-23 出版日期:2024-09-15 发布日期:2024-09-19
通讯作者: 姚海鑫,辽宁大学教授,博士,主要从事公司治理、公司财务与企业并购研究,联系方式hxyao5807@sina.com
作者简介:杜心宇,辽宁大学博士研究生,辽宁工业大学讲师,主要从事公司财务与企业并购研究;张晓旭,辽宁科技大学讲师,博士,主要从事企业并购研究。
基金资助:
辽宁省社会科学规划基金青年项目“ESG理念驱动辽宁重污染企业绿色并购的作用机理与实现路径研究”（L22CGL017）

Enterprise ESG Performance and Green M&A Premium: Promoting or Inhibiting?

DU Xin-yu^1,2, YAO Hai-xin¹, ZHANG Xiao-xu³

1. Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136;
2. Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001;
3. Liaoning University of Science and Technology, Anshan 114051, China

Received:2024-04-26 Revised:2024-07-23 Online:2024-09-15 Published:2024-09-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来,绿色并购成为企业积极响应生态文明建设的重要方式。以2010—2022年A股上市公司绿色并购为样本,分析了主并企业ESG表现对绿色并购溢价的影响。研究发现,主并企业ESG表现好、并购双方ESG匹配度高可以抑制绿色并购溢价。机制分析发现,主并企业ESG表现好可以降低其内外部之间的信息不对称程度、提高其声誉、减少其管理者的自利行为,从而可抑制绿色并购溢价。异质性分析发现,主并企业ESG表现对绿色并购溢价的抑制作用在纵向并购和混合并购中更显著,目标企业为重污染企业也更显著。此外,主并企业ESG表现越好、并购双方ESG匹配度越高,并购后主并企业的商誉减值计提越少。为此,政府应建立更明确的ESG评估体系和更详细的ESG披露要求,企业应更积极地履行社会责任,以抑制绿色并购溢价。

关键词: ESG表现, ESG匹配度, 绿色并购溢价

Abstract: In recent years, green M&A has become an important way for enterprises to respond actively to ecological civilization construction. Taking the green M&A of A-share listed enterprises from 2010 to 2022 as samples, this paper analyzes the impact of the ESG performance of the active acquiring enterprises on the green M&A premium. The findings show that the good ESG performance of the acquiring enterprise or the high ESG matching degree of the merger and acquisition parties can inhibit the green M&A premium. The mechanism analysis indicates that the good ESG performance of the acquiring enterprise can reduce the degree of internal and external information asymmetry, enhance corporate reputation, reduce managers' self-serving behaviors, so as to inhibit the green M&A premium. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that the inhibitory effect of ESG performance of the acquiring company on the premium of green mergers and acquisitions is more significant in vertical and mixed mergers and acquisitions, and it is also more significant in the target companies that are heavily polluting. In addition, the better ESG performance of the acquiring enterprises, the higher degree of the matching between both sides of the M&A, the less impairment provision for goodwill of the acquiring company after M&A. Therefore, the government should establish a clearer ESG evaluation system and more detailed ESG disclosure requirements, and enterprises should fulfil their social responsibilities more actively, so as to inhibit the green M&A premium.

Key words: ESG performance, ESG matching, green M&A premium

中图分类号:

F272.3

杜心宇, 姚海鑫, 张晓旭. 企业ESG表现与绿色并购溢价：促进还是抑制[J]. 当代财经, 2024, 0(9): 139-151.

DU Xin-yu, YAO Hai-xin, ZHANG Xiao-xu. Enterprise ESG Performance and Green M&A Premium: Promoting or Inhibiting?[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2024, 0(9): 139-151.

参考文献

[1] 高延歌, 冯建. 企业ESG表现与“存贷双高”异象[J]. 当代财经, 2024, (5): 142-153.
[2] 黄维娜, 袁天荣. 实质性转型升级还是策略性政策套利——绿色产业政策对工业企业绿色并购的影响[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2021, (3): 56-67.
[3] 蓝发钦, 国文婷. 企业并购中的匹配效应——并购溢价和标的公司盈利质量对并购绩效的影响研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2022, (5): 50-64.
[4] 李思慧, 郑素兰. ESG的实施抑制了企业成长吗?[J]. 经济问题, 2022, (12): 81-89.
[5] 罗进辉, 巫奕龙, 刘海潮, 等. 亲清政商关系的绿色治理效应——来自绿色并购的证据[J]. 财经研究, 2023, (11): 34-49.
[6] 潘爱玲, 王慧, 邱金龙. 儒家文化与重污染企业绿色并购[J]. 会计研究, 2021, (5): 133-147.
[7] 王芳. 企业ESG表现与低碳绿色转型——基于金融政策工具支持的效应评估[J]. 当代财经, 2024, (1): 86-103.
[8] 王晓颖, 贾银华, 马真真. 避免“煮熟的鸭子飞走”:CEO家族属性、伪禀赋效应与并购溢价[J]. 外国经济与管理,2021, (6): 74-89.
[9] 严甜甜, 李婉丽, 钟宇翔. 超额商誉:“获利利器”还是“赢家诅咒”?——基于企业社会责任的视角[J]. 经济管理, 2022, (10): 111-128.
[10] 姚海鑫, 杜心宇, 张晓旭. 资本市场开放对企业并购融资的影响研究——基于“陆港通”多期双重差分的经验证据[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版),2024, (1): 17-30.
[11] Aktas N, De Bodt E, Roll R.Serial acquirer bidding: An empirical test of the learning hypothesis[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011, 17(1): 18-32.
[12] Arvidsson S, Dumay J.Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2022, 31(3): 1091-1110.
[13] Berchicci L, Dowell G, King A A.Environmental performance and the market for corporate assets[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(12): 2444-2464.
[14] Fralich R, Papadopoulos A.The financial crisis, acquisition premiums and the moderating effect of CEO power[J]. Long Range Planning, 2018, 51(2): 204-218.
[15] Ozdemir O, Binesh F, Erkmen E.The effect of target's CSR performance on M&A deal premiums: A case for service firms[J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2022, 16(4): 1001-1034.
[16] Roychowdhury S, Shroff N, Verdi R S.The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review[J]. Journal of Accounting Economics, 2019, 68(2-3): 101246.
[17] Slusky A R, Caves R E.Synergy, agency, and the determinants of premia paid in mergers[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1991, 39(3): 277-296.
[18] Varaiya N P.Determinants of premiums in acquisition transactions[J]. Managerial Decision Economics, 1987, 8(3): 175-184.