生产性服务业开放与制造业企业绿色发展

当代财经 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 124-138.

生产性服务业开放与制造业企业绿色发展

赵春明¹, 刘珊珊¹, 李震²

1.北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京 100875;
2.北京邮电大学经济管理学院,北京 100876

收稿日期:2023-06-13 修回日期:2023-11-04 出版日期:2024-03-15 发布日期:2024-03-04
通讯作者: 刘珊珊,北京师范大学博士研究生,主要从事国际贸易与数字经济研究,联系方式ssliu2021@163.com。
作者简介:赵春明,北京师范大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事国际贸易与国际投资研究;李震,北京邮电大学讲师,博士,主要从事国际贸易与发展经济学研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点项目“工业智能化应用对我国贸易高质量发展的影响研究”（22AJL012）; 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“新发展格局下减税对县域经济发展的影响研究：理论、机制与经验证据”（22YJC790067）; 北京邮电大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“机器人智能技术对人力资本积累的影响研究”（2022RC60）

Opening up of Producer Services and Green Development of Manufacturing Enterprises

ZHAO Chun-ming¹, LIU Shan-shan¹, LI Zhen²

1. Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
2. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

Received:2023-06-13 Revised:2023-11-04 Online:2024-03-15 Published:2024-03-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 推动高水平开放和绿色发展是中国经济高质量发展的重要目标。基于中国工业企业数据库和污染排放数据库的匹配数据,理论分析并实证考察了生产性服务业开放与企业绿色发展的关系。研究发现,生产性服务业开放会显著降低企业污染排放强度,推动企业绿色发展。机制分析表明,提高企业末端治理能力和企业管理效率是生产性服务业开放推动企业绿色发展的两条重要途径。异质性分析表明,生产性服务业开放对企业污染排放的降低效应在高污染强度行业中的表现更为突出,对高融资约束企业和高能源消耗企业环境绩效的提升作用更强。此外,生产性服务业开放对制造业与服务业共聚水平较高地区的减排效应作用更大。进一步研究发现,生产性服务业开放不仅有利于推动行业内低污染排放强度企业进入和高污染排放强度企业退出的动态更替,还有助于实现制造业企业绿色技术创新、绿色产品创新、能源利用效率提升以及能源投入结构优化。未来政府需要合理制定并实施阶梯性的服务业开放政策,优化地区服务业和制造业产业空间布局,引导生产性服务业与制造业的嵌入融合,赋能制造业绿色生产和绿色创新发展。

关键词: 生产性服务业, 企业污染排放, 制造业企业, 绿色发展

Abstract: Promoting high-level opening up and green development is an important goal of China’s high-quality economic development. Based on the matching data of the China Industrial Enterprise Database and the Pollution Emission Database, this paper theoretically analyzes and empirically examines the relationship between the openness of the producer service industry and the green development of enterprises. The findings show that the opening up of the producer service industry will significantly reduce the pollution emission intensity of enterprisesand promote the green development of enterprises. The analysis of the influencing mechanism shows that improving the end governance capacity and management efficiency of enterprises are two important ways for the opening up of producer services to promote the green development of enterprises. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the effect of opening up the producer service industry on reducing corporate pollution emissions is more prominent in the industries with higher pollution intensity, and a stronger effect can be seen on improving the environmental performance of the enterprises with higher financing constraints and higher energy consumption. In addition, the opening up of the producer service industry has a greater impact on the emission reduction effect in areas with a higher level of co-aggregation of the manufacturing and service industries. Further research reveals that the opening up of the producer service industry is not only conducive to the dynamic replacement of the entry of low-pollution emission intensity enterprises and the exit of high-pollution emission intensity enterprises in the industry, it will also help realize green technology innovation, green product innovation, energy utilization efficiency improvement and energy input structure optimization of manufacturing enterprises. In the future, the government needs to rationally formulate and implement step-by-step opening policies for the service industry, optimize the spatial layout of regional service and manufacturing industries, guide the embedded integration of producer services industry and manufacturing industry, and empower the green production and green innovation development of the manufacturing industry.

Key words: producer services, enterprise pollution emissions, manufacturing firms, green development

中图分类号:

F719

赵春明, 刘珊珊, 李震. 生产性服务业开放与制造业企业绿色发展[J]. 当代财经, 2024, 0(3): 124-138.

ZHAO Chun-ming, LIU Shan-shan, LI Zhen. Opening up of Producer Services and Green Development of Manufacturing Enterprises[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2024, 0(3): 124-138.

参考文献

[1] 沈红波,谢越,陈峥嵘. 企业的环境保护、社会责任及其市场效应——基于紫金矿业环境污染事件的案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2012, (1): 141-151.
[2] 韩峰,谢锐. 生产性服务业集聚降低碳排放了吗?——对我国地级及以上城市面板数据的空间计量分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2017, (3): 40-58.
[3] 张艳,唐宜红,周默涵. 服务贸易自由化是否提高了制造业企业生产效率[J]. 世界经济,2013, (11): 51-71.
[4] Bas M., Causa O.Trade and Product Market Policies in Upstream Sectors and Productivity in Downstream Sectors: Firm-level Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2013, 41(3): 843-862.
[5] Arnold J.M., Javorcik B., Lipscomb M., Mattoo A. Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India[J]. The Economic Journal, 2016, 126(590): 1-39.
[6] 江小涓. 服务业增长:真实含义、多重影响和发展趋势[J]. 经济研究,2011, (4): 4-14.
[7] 齐俊妍,任同莲. 生产性服务业开放、行业异质性与制造业服务化[J]. 经济与管理研究,2020, (3): 72-86.
[8] 邵朝对,苏丹妮, 王晨. 服务业开放、外资管制与企业创新:理论和中国经验[J]. 经济学(季刊),2021, (4): 1411-1432.
[9] 孙浦阳,侯欣裕,盛斌. 服务业开放、管理效率与企业出口[J]. 经济研究,2018, (7): 136-151.
[10] 符大海,鲁成浩. 服务业开放促进贸易方式转型——企业层面的理论和中国经验[J]. 中国工业经济,2021, (7): 156-174.
[11] 赵春明,刘珊珊,李震. 生产性服务业开放对企业出口国内附加值率影响研究[J]. 亚太经济,2023, (3): 109-122.
[12] Mont O.K. Clarifying the Concept of Product-Service System[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2002, 10(3): 237-245.
[13] 邵朝对,苏丹妮,杨琦. 外资进入对东道国本土企业的环境效应:来自中国的证据[J]. 世界经济,2021, (3): 32-60.
[14] 苏丹妮,盛斌. 服务业外资开放如何影响企业环境绩效——来自中国的经验[J]. 中国工业经济,2021, (6): 61-79.
[15] Forslid R., Okubo T., Ulltveit-Moe K.H. Why Are Firms That Export Cleaner? International Trade, Abatement and Environmental Emissions[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2018, 91(7): 166-183.
[16] Qiu L.D., Yu M. Export Scope, Managerial Efficiency, and Trade Liberalization: Evidence from Chinese Firms[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2020, 177(11): 71-90.
[17] Bloom N., Eifert B., Mahajan A., McKenzie D., Roberts J. Does Management Matter? Evidence from India[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 2013, 128(1): 1-51.
[18] Bloom N., Van Reenen J.Measuring and Explaining Management Practices across Firms and Countries[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007, 122(4): 1351-1408.
[19] Shapiro J.S., Walker R. Why Is Pollution from US Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade[J]. American Economic Review, 2018, 108(12): 3814-3854.
[20] Copeland B.R., Taylor M. S. North-South Trade and the Environment[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, 109(3): 755-787.
[21] 王孝松,田思远,李玏. 贸易开放、环境规制与污染——来自中国制造业的经验证据[J]. 统计研究,2022, (5): 79-92.
[22] 陈诗一,张建鹏,刘朝良. 环境规制、融资约束与企业污染减排——来自排污费标准调整的证据[J]. 金融研究,2021, (9): 51-71.
[23] 许和连,成丽红,孙天阳. 制造业投入服务化对企业出口国内增加值的提升效应——基于中国制造业微观企业的经验研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2017, (10): 62-80.
[24] 陆菁,鄢云,王韬璇. 绿色信贷政策的微观效应研究——基于技术创新与资源再配置的视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2021, (1): 174-192.
[25] 杨仁发. 产业集聚能否改善中国环境污染[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015, (2): 23-29.
[26] Brandt L., Van Biesebroeck J., Wang L.H., Zhang Y. F. WTO Accession and Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms[J]. American Economic Association, 2017, 107(9): 2784-2820.
[27] 解学梅,朱琪玮. 企业绿色创新实践如何破解“和谐共生”难题?[J]. 管理世界,2021, (1): 128-149.
[28] 史丹,李少林. 排污权交易制度与能源利用效率——对地级及以上城市的测度与实证[J]. 中国工业经济,2020, (9): 5-23.