全球价值链数字化对中国制造业国际分工地位的影响

当代财经 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 99-111.

全球价值链数字化对中国制造业国际分工地位的影响

李丹¹, 武杰¹, 董程慧²

1.辽宁大学金融与贸易学院,辽宁沈阳 110136;
2.暨南大学经济学院,广东广州 510632

收稿日期:2022-01-24 修回日期:2022-07-12 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2022-09-09
通讯作者: 武杰,辽宁大学博士研究生,主要从事国际贸易理论与政策研究,联系方式2647852128@qq.com。
作者简介:李丹,辽宁大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事国际贸易理论与政策研究;董程慧,暨南大学博士研究生,主要从事国际贸易理论与政策研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“建设面向东北亚开放合作高地与推进新时代东北振兴研究”（20&ZD097）; 国家社会科学基金项目“全球价值链数字化对中国制造业高质量发展的影响机制与推进策略”（21BJL070）

The Impact of Global Value Chain Digitization on the Status of China’s Manufacturing Industry in the International Division of Labor

LI Dan¹, WU Jie¹, DONG Cheng-hui²

1. Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136;
2. Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

Received:2022-01-24 Revised:2022-07-12 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-09-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将增加值贸易总分解方法拓展到数字贸易层面,基于贸易数字化视角构建全球价值链数字化测度框架,从双向数字关联、数字化依存度及国际比较等维度分析中国制造业融入数字全球价值链的现状,利用层级结构分解方法分析中国制造业国际分工地位的影响因素。主要研究结论如下：中国制造业主要通过前向参与方式融入数字全球价值链分工体系,在数字全球价值链位置中处于中游水平,以美国为首的发达经济体占据制造业数字贸易主导地位;中国制造业数字化增加值出口对发达经济体市场的依赖性较强,其中前向数字化增加值出口所依存经济体的分布范围更广,后向数字化增加值出口所依存经济体的集中度较高;出口国内增加值相对属性因子和全球价值链数字化属性因子的正向变动能够显著提升中国制造业国际分工地位。

关键词: 数字贸易, 全球价值链数字化, 制造业国际分工地位

Abstract: This article extends the total value-added trade decomposition method to the level of digital trade, constructs a digital measurement framework for the global value chain from the perspective of trade digitalization, analyzes the integration of China’s manufacturing industry in the digital global value chain from the dimensions of two-way digital correlation, digital dependence and international comparison, and analyzes the factors affecting the status of China’s manufacturing industry in the international division of labor with the hierarchical structure decomposition method. The main research conclusions are as follows: China’s manufacturing industry is mainly integrated into the digital global value chain division of labor through forward participation, and it is at the midstream level in the digital global value chain positioning. The developed economies led by the United States hold the dominant position of digital trade in the manufacturing industry. The digital value-added export of China’s manufacturing industry is strongly dependent on the markets of developed economies, in which the forward digital value-added export that is dependent on the economies is more widely distributed, while the backward digital value-added export that is dependent on the economies is more concentrated. The positive changes in the relative attribute factor of exporting domestic added value and the digital attribute factor of the global value chain can significantly improve the status of China’s manufacturing industry in the international division of labor.

Key words: digital trade, digitalization of global value chain, the status of the manufacturing industry in international division of labor

中图分类号:

F746

李丹, 武杰, 董程慧. 全球价值链数字化对中国制造业国际分工地位的影响[J]. 当代财经, 2022, 0(8): 99-111.

LI Dan, WU Jie, DONG Cheng-hui. The Impact of Global Value Chain Digitization on the Status of China’s Manufacturing Industry in the International Division of Labor[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2022, 0(8): 99-111.

参考文献

[1] Hummels D.,Ishi J., Yi K.M. The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics,2001, 54(1): 75-96.
[2] Koopman R.,Wang Z.,Wei S.J. Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports[J]. American Economic Review,2014, 104(2):459-494.
[3] Wang Z., Wei S.J., Zhu K. F. Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels[R]. NBER Working Paper,No. 19677,2013.
[4] Wang Z., Wei S.J., Xu X. D., Zhu K. F. Measures of Participationin Global Value Chains and Global Business Cycles[R]. NBER Working Paper, No.2322,2017a.
[5] Wang Z., Wei S.J., Xu X. D. Zhu K. F. Characterizing Global Value Chains: Production Length and Up streamness [R].NBER Working Paper,No.23261,2017b.
[6] Upward R., Wang Z., Zheng J.Weighing China’s Export Basket: The Domestic Content and Technology Intensity of Chinese Exports[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2013,41(2):527-543.
[7] 张杰,陈志远,刘元春. 中国出口国内附加值的测算与变化机制[J]. 经济研究,2013,(10):124-137.
[8] 吕越,黄艳希,陈勇兵. 全球价值链嵌入的生产率效应: 影响与机制分析[J]. 世界经济,2017,(7):28-51.
[9] International Trade Commission of the United States. Global Digital Trade 1: Market Opportunities and Key Foreign Trade Restriction[EB/OL]. (2017-05-03) [2022-01-10]. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4716.
[10] 中国信息通信研究院. 数字贸易发展与影响白皮书[EB/OL]. (2019-12-31) [2022-01-10]. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/201912/P020191226585408287738.
[11] OECD, WTO, IMF. Handbook on Measuring Digital Trade, Version 1[EB/OL]. (2020-03-08) [2022-01-10]. https://www.oecd.org/sdd/its/Handbook-on-Measuring-Digital-Trade-Version-1.
[12] 岳云嵩,张春飞. 数字贸易统计测度分析[J]. 国际贸易,2021,(8):70-77.
[13] 贾怀勤,高晓雨,许晓娟,方元欣. 数字贸易测度的概念架构、指标体系和测度方法初探[J]. 统计研究,2021,(12):30-41.
[14] 徐金海,夏杰长. 全球价值链视角的数字贸易发展:战略定位与中国路径[J]. 改革,2020,(5):58-67.
[15] 吕延方,方若楠,王冬. 中国服务贸易融入数字全球价值链的测度构建及特征研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2020,(12):25-44.
[16] 张亚斌,马莉莉,刚翠翠.“一带一路”数字服务出口增加值、价值链地位及其决定因素———基于全球多区域投入产出模型的实证研究[J]. 经济问题探索,2021,(7):177-190.
[17] 倪红福. 全球价值链位置测度理论的回顾和展望[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报,2019,(3):105-117+160.
[18] Fally T.Production Staging: Measurement and Facts[R].University of Colorado-Boulder, 2012.
[19] Koller W.,Stehrer R. Trade Integration,Outsourcing and Employment in Austria: a Decomposition Approach[J].Economic Systems Research,2010,22(3): 237-261.
[20] 国家统计局. 数字经济及其核心产业统计分类[EB/OL]. (2021-05-22) [2022-01-10]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/202106/t20210603_1818134.html.
[21] 许宪春,张美慧. 中国数字经济规模测算研究——基于国际比较的视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2020,(5):23-41.
[22] 张亚斌,范子杰,冯迪. 中国GDP出口分解及贡献新测度[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2015,(9):21-38.
[23] 张会清,翟孝强. 中国参与全球价值链的特征与启示——基于生产分解模型的研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2018,(1):3-22.