流动人口的迁移模式与市民化

当代财经 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 3-15.

• 理论经济 • 下一篇

流动人口的迁移模式与市民化

徐藜洋¹, 李湉湉²

1.中南财政法大学经济学院,湖北武汉 430073;
2.上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院,上海 200433

收稿日期:2021-03-02 修回日期:2021-03-02 出版日期:2021-08-15 发布日期:2021-09-02
通讯作者: 徐藜洋,中南财经政法大学博士研究生,主要从事发展经济学研究,联系方式xu_liyang11_02@163.com。
作者简介:李湉湉,上海财经大学博士研究生,主要从事社会保障和劳动经济学研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目“我国低收入家庭的代际阶层流动实现机制研究” （18BJY046）; 中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助（202110321）

Migration Patterns of Floating Population and Citizenization

XU Li-yang¹, LI Tian-tian²

1. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073;
2. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China

Received:2021-03-02 Revised:2021-03-02 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-09-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 流动人口实现市民化的程度可能与流动人口迁移的具体模式有关。利用全国流动人口卫生计生动态检测调查2017年数据的实证研究表明,迁移模式对流动人口的市民化存在以下影响:第一,相对于单独流动而言,只与子女一起迁移、只与父母一起迁移、与配偶和子女一起迁移、与配偶和父母一起迁移、与配偶子女和父母一起迁移对流动个体市民化均有显著的正向影响,其中与配偶子女和父母一起迁移对市民化水平的提高程度最大,大约使流动个体市民化水平提高5.8个百分点。第二,只与子女一起迁移、与配偶和子女一起迁移这两种迁移模式对年轻流动个体、女性流动个体和高中以上学历的流动个体市民化水平的影响不显著;对于这三个群体,父母在提高其市民化水平方面的积极影响仍然存在,且边际影响更大。第三,对于未婚流动个体,与父母一起迁移对其市民化有显著的积极影响。

关键词: 流动人口, 迁移模式, 市民化, 公共服务

Abstract: The level of citizenization of the floating population may be related to the specific pattern of migration. Based on the data of China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) in 2017, this paper examines the impact of migration pattern on the citizenization. The findings of the empiric research are as follows: first, compared with single person migration, the five other patterns of migration have a significant positive impact on the citizenization of the mobile individuals, including the migration only with children, the migration only with parents, the migration with spouse and children, the migration with spouse and parents, and the migration with spouse, children and parents. Of the five patterns, the migration with spouse, children and parents has the greatest impact on the citizenization level, which can improve the citizenization level of migrant individuals by about 5.8%. Second, these two migrant patterns — the migration with children and the migration with spouse and children — have no significant influence on the level of citizenization for young migrant individuals, female migrant individuals and migrant individuals with a high school degree or above. For these three groups, the positive influence of parents in improving their citizenization level still exists, and the marginal influence is relatively greater. Third, for unmarried migrant individuals, the migration with their parents has a significant positive impact on their citizenization.

Key words: floating population, migrant pattern, citizenization, public service

中图分类号:

F061.3

徐藜洋, 李湉湉. 流动人口的迁移模式与市民化[J]. 当代财经, 2021, 0(8): 3-15.

XU Li-yang, LI Tian-tian. Migration Patterns of Floating Population and Citizenization[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2021, 0(8): 3-15.

参考文献

[1] Au C.C., Henderson J. V. Are Chinese Cities Too Small?[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2006, 73(3): 549-576.
[2] Liu C.J., Xu J. L. Second Generation Peasant Workers and Their Citizenization[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2007, 17(1): 6-12.
[3] Chen S.W., Liu Z. L. What Determines the Settlement Intention of Rural Migrants in China? Economic Incentives versus Sociocultural Conditions[J]. Habitat International, 2016, 58(1): 42-50.
[4] 苏丽锋. 中国流动人口市民化水平测算及影响因素研究[J]. 中国人口科学,2017,(2):12-24+126.
[5] 王春超,张呈磊. 子女随迁与农民工的城市融入感[J]. 社会学研究,2017,(2):199-224.
[6] 郑新立. 实现十三五最大的新动能[J]. 当代财经,2017,(1):7-8.
[7] 蔡昉. 农业劳动力转移潜力耗尽了吗?[J]. 中国农村经济,2018,(9):2-13.
[8] 田艳平. 家庭化与非家庭化农民工的城市融入比较研究[J]. 农业经济问题,2014,(12):53-62.
[9] 才国伟,张学志. 农民工的城市归属感与定居决策[J]. 经济管理,2011,(2):158-168.
[10] 张光辉. 新型城镇化、户籍制度改革与农民工市民化研究[J]. 产经评论,2019,(5):108-123.
[11] 梁土坤. 医疗保险、群体结构与农民工市民化意愿[J]. 人口与发展,2020,(3):51-64.
[12] 宁光杰,李瑞. 城乡一体化进程中农民工流动范围与市民化差异[J]. 中国人口科学,2016,(4):37-47+126-127.
[13] 丁宏,成前,倪润哲. 城镇化的不平等、市民化与居民健康水平[J]. 南开经济研究,2018,(6):22-37.
[14] 徐延辉,龚紫钰. 社会质量与农民工的市民化[J]. 经济学家,2019,(7):90-100.
[15] Chow H.Sense of Belonging and Life Satisfaction among Hong Kong Adolescent Immigrants in Canada[J]. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 2007, 33(3): 511-520.
[16] Raijiman R., Geffen R.Sense of Belonging and Life Satisfaction among Post-1990 Immigrants in Israel[J]. International Migration, 2017, 56(3): 10-24.
[17] Khoo S.E. Sponsorship of Relatives for Migration and Immigrant Settlement Intention[J]. International Migration, 2010, 41(5): 177-199.
[18] Van De Poel E., O'donnell O., Van Doorslaer E. Is There a Health Penalty of China's Rapid Urbanization?[J].Health Economics, 2012, 21(4): 367-385.
[19] Baiden P., Den Dunnen W., Arku G., Mkandawire P.The Role of Sense of Community Belonging on Unmet Health Care Needs in Ontario, Canada: Findings from the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey[J]. Journal of Public Health, 2014, 22(5): 467-478.
[20] Akgü M., Liu X.F., Tani M., Zimmermann K. F. Risk Attitudes and Migration[J]. China Economic Review, 2016, 37(1): 166-176.
[21] 冯婧. 隐性因子对农民工归属感影响的实证研究[J]. 农业经济问题,2016,(1):53-61+111.
[22] 张文武,欧习,徐嘉婕. 城市规模、社会保障与农业转移人口市民化意愿[J]. 农业经济问题,2018,(9):128-140.
[23] Orellana F.M., Throne B., Chee A., Lam W. S. Transnational Childhoods: The Participation of Children in Processes of Family Migration[J]. Social Problems, 2001, 48(4): 572-591.
[24] Cook J.Exploring Older Women's Citizenship: Understanding the Impact of Migration in Later Life[J]. Ageing & Society, 2010, 30(2): 253-273.
[25] Gu D.N., Feng Q. S., Sautter J. M., Qiu L. Exposure to Urban Life and Mortality Risk among Older Adults in China[J]. International Journal of Population Studies, 2017, 3(1): 1-21.
[26] Peng Y.Bringing Children to the Cities: Gendered Migrant Parenting and the Family Dynamics of Rural-urban Migrants in China[J]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2018, 46(7): 1-18.
[27] 王文刚,孙桂平,张文忠,王利敏. 京津冀地区流动人口家庭化迁移的特征与影响机理[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2017,(1):137-145.
[28] 简新华,罗钜钧,黄锟. 中国城镇化的质量问题和健康发展[J]. 当代财经,2013,(9):5-16.
[29] Cooke T.J. Family Migration and the Relative Earnings of Husbands and Wives[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2001, 93(2): 338-349.

流动人口的迁移模式与市民化

Migration Patterns of Floating Population and Citizenization

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨小忠, 罗乐. 城市人力资本空间分层：异质性公共服务视角[J]. 当代财经, 2021, 0(2): 3-14.
[2]	胡玉杰1，彭徽2. 财政分权、晋升激励与农村医疗卫生公共服务供给——基于我国省际面板数据的实证研究[J]. 当代财经, 2019, 0(04): 1795-.
[3]	肖敏慧1，王邃遂2，彭浩然3. 迁移压力、社会资本与流动人口心理健康——基于压力过程理论的研究[J]. 当代财经, 2019, 0(03): 11-.
[4]	匡小平，赵丹. 县级基本公共服务供给与财政分权体制的关系研究——以江西省为例[J]. 当代财经, 2015, 0(07): 552-.
[5]	周小刚. 农民工对江西经济增长的贡献与成果分享测度[J]. 当代财经, 2009, 0(01): 910-.
[6]	郭宏宝. 公共服务均等化：理论评价与实际应用[J]. 当代财经, 2008, 0(03): 667-.