技术引进税收优惠政策提高了产业创新能力吗——基于《中国鼓励引进技术目录》的准自然实验

当代财经 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 101-113.

技术引进税收优惠政策提高了产业创新能力吗——基于《中国鼓励引进技术目录》的准自然实验

吴昌南, 钟家福

江西财经大学规制与竞争研究中心/产业经济研究院,江西南昌 330013

收稿日期:2020-04-17 修回日期:2020-08-12 出版日期:2020-09-15 发布日期:2020-12-10
通讯作者: 吴昌南,江西财经大学教授,博士,主要从事产业经济与技术创新研究,联系方式wuchnan@sohu.com
作者简介:钟家福,江西财经大学规制与竞争研究中心助理研究员,主要从事产业创新研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“中国售后市场反垄断研究”(71663020);江西省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“我国邻省域碳排放跨界污染与环境规制研究”(JD16048)

Has Preferential Tax Policy for Technology Imports Improved Industrial Innovation Capacity? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China's Catalogue for Technologies Encouraged to Import

WU Chang-nan, ZHONG Jia-fu

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China

Received:2020-04-17 Revised:2020-08-12 Online:2020-09-15 Published:2020-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提高产业创新能力是经济新常态下我国面临的迫切任务。以2006年出台的《中国鼓励引进技术目录》涉及的59个享受技术引进税收优惠政策的四位码工业行业为实验组,以501个没有享受技术引进税收优惠政策的行业为对照组,利用2001—2015年的数据,采用双重差分法考察了技术引进税收优惠政策与产业创新能力的关系。研究发现:享受技术引进税收优惠政策的产业能显著提升产业创新能力,尤其是对高技术产业创新能力的提升更为显著;技术引进税收优惠政策提高产业创新能力的作用机制是该政策可以引致企业增加引进技术经费支出和技术改造经费支出;金融机构对产业创新融资的支持力度与技术引进税收优惠政策在提高产业创新能力上存在替代关系。

关键词: 技术引进, 税收优惠政策, 产业创新能力

Abstract: Improving the industrial innovation capacity is an urgent task that China is faced with under the new economic normality. Taking the 59 four-digit code industries that enjoy the preferential tax policy for technology import covered in China's Catalogue for Technologies Encouraged to Import released in 2006 as the experimental group and the 501 industries that do not enjoy the preferential tax policy for technology import as the control group, this paper makes use of the data from 2001 to 2015 and employs the double difference method to examine the relationship between the preferential tax policy for technology import and the industrial innovative capacity. The results indicate that the industries that enjoy the preferential tax policy for technology imports can significantly improve their industrial innovation capacity, especially for the high-tech industries. The effective mechanism for the improvement of industrial innovation capacity by the preferential tax policy for technology imports is that this policy can lead the enterprises to increase their spending on imported technologies and technical upgrading. There is a substitutional relation between the support of the financial institutions to the industrial innovation financing and the preferential tax policy for technology imports in improving industrial innovation capacity.

Key words: technology imports, preferential tax policy, industrial innovation capacity

中图分类号:

F273.1
F425

吴昌南, 钟家福. 技术引进税收优惠政策提高了产业创新能力吗——基于《中国鼓励引进技术目录》的准自然实验[J]. 当代财经, 2020, 0(9): 101-113.

WU Chang-nan, ZHONG Jia-fu. Has Preferential Tax Policy for Technology Imports Improved Industrial Innovation Capacity? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China's Catalogue for Technologies Encouraged to Import[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2020, 0(9): 101-113.

参考文献

[1] 文玉春. 我国产业创新的模式与路径选择研究[J]. 经济问题, 2017, (1): 1-10.
[2] 欧伟强, 朱斌. 企业引进消化吸收再创新的风险分析[J]. 科技与经济, 2009,(5):39-42.
[3] Hall B., Reenen J.V. How Effective Are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A New Review of the Evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4-5): 449-469.
[4] Bloom N., Griffith R., Reenen J.V. Do R&D Tax Credits Work? Evidence from a Panel of Countries 1979-1997[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2002, 85(1): 1-31.
[5] 冯海红, 曲婉, 李铭禄. 税收优惠政策有利于企业加大研发投入吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2015,(5):665-673.
[6] 夏杰长, 尚铁力. 自主创新与税收政策:理论分析、实证研究与对策建议[J]. 税务研究, 2006,(6):6-10.
[7] 江希和, 王水娟. 企业研发投资税收优惠政策效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015,(6):46-52.
[8] Cappelen A., Raknerud A., Rybalka M.The Effects of R&D Tax Credits on Patenting and Innovations[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(2): 334-345.
[9] 张信东, 贺亚楠, 马小美. R&D税收优惠政策对企业创新产出的激励效果分析——基于国家级企业技术中心的研究[J]. 当代财经, 2014, (11): 35-45.
[10] Czarnitzki D., Hanel P., Rosa J.M. Evaluating the Impact of R&D Tax Credits on Iinnovation: A Microeconometric Study on Canadian Firms[J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(2): 217-229.
[11] 朱平芳, 徐伟民. 政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D投入及其专利产出的影响——上海市的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2003,(6):45-53.
[12] 夏力. 税收优惠能否促进技术创新: 基于创业板上市公司的研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2012, (12): 56-61.
[13] 石绍宾, 周根根, 秦丽华. 税收优惠对我国企业研发投入和产出的激励效应[J]. 税务研究, 2017, (3): 43-47.
[14] Mamuneas T.P., Nadiri M. I. Public R&D Policies and Cost Behavior of the US Manufacturing Industries[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1996, 63(1): 57-81.
[15] 戴晨, 刘怡. 税收优惠与财政补贴对企业R&D影响的比较分析[J]. 经济科学, 2008, (3): 58-71.
[16] 陈林, 朱卫平. 出口退税和创新补贴政策效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2008,(11):74-87.
[17] Jorgenson D.Capital Theory and Investment Behavior[J]. American Economic Review, 1963, 53(2): 247-259.
[18] Klette T.J., Griliches Z. The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators When Output Prices Are Unobserved and Endogenous[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1996, 11(4): 343-361.
[19] 寇宗来, 刘学悦. 中国城市和产业创新力报告2017[EB/OL].(2018-01-05)[2020-05-12]. 第一财经研究院,http://www.cbnri.org/news/5389402.html.
[20] Schankerman M., Pakes A.The Rate of Obsolescence and the Distribution of Patent Values-Some Evidence from European Patent Renewals[J]. Revue économique, 1985, 36(5): 917-941.
[21] Moser P., Voena A.Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(1): 396-427.
[22] Dasgupta P., Stiglitz J.E. Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, 11(1): 1-28.
[23] Reinganum J.F. A Dynamic Game of R and D: Patent Protection and Competitive Behavior[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50(3): 671-688.
[24] Hodler R., Raschky P.A. Regional Favoritism[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2014, 129(2): 995-1033.
[25] 蒋灵多, 陆毅, 陈勇兵. 市场机制是否有利于僵尸企业处置: 以外资管制放松为例[J]. 世界经济, 2018, (9): 121-145.