中美制造业环境友好型全球价值链地位的测算——基于世界投入产出表及其环境账户

当代财经 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 101-113.

中美制造业环境友好型全球价值链地位的测算——基于世界投入产出表及其环境账户

桑丹丹^a, 王元月^a, 丁黎黎^a,b

中国海洋大学 a.经济学院; b.海洋发展研究院,山东青岛 266100

收稿日期:2020-04-01 修回日期:2020-07-14 出版日期:2020-08-15 发布日期:2020-12-10
通讯作者: 丁黎黎,中国海洋大学教授,博士生导师,博士,山东省泰山学者青年专家（tsqn20161014）,主要从事绿色发展与海洋经济研究,联系方式llding@ouc.edu.cn
作者简介:桑丹丹,中国海洋大学博士研究生,主要从事资源开发与国民经济可持续发展研究;王元月,中国海洋大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事资源开发与国民经济可持续发展研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“技术偏向视角下海洋经济绿色增长效率评估及提升路径研究”(71973132); 山东省社会科学规划研究项目“双环流价值链视角下山东海洋产业新旧动能转移路径研究”(19CGLJ30)

Estimation of the Environmental Friendly Global Value Chain Position for China and USA Manufacturing Industries: Based on World Input-Output Tables and Their Environmental Accounts

SANG Dan-dan, WANG Yuan-yue, DING Li-li

Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

Received:2020-04-01 Revised:2020-07-14 Online:2020-08-15 Published:2020-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用世界投入产出表及其环境账户数据,提出环境友好型全球价值链（GVC）地位指数的测算方法。在碳生产率和GVC地位指数的基础之上,定义出口中单位隐含碳的增加值、间接单位隐含碳增加值出口、出口中单位国外隐含碳的国外增加值。并以中美制造业为例,从高技术制造业、中高技术制造业、中低技术制造业、低技术制造业四个层面进行GVC地位指数与环境友好型GVC地位指数的对比分析,发现中国高技术制造业的产业发展水平与美国有较大差距,但中美高技术制造业的环境友好型生产水平相差较小;中国中高、中低、低技术制造业的发展多依赖于碳排放,多以环境为代价,环境友好型生产水平较弱。然而,中国少部分低技术制造业,如木材和木制品业（家具以外）与稻草和编结材料制品业、记录媒体的印刷和复制业的环境友好型生产水平,从2008年后均高于美国。

关键词: 环境友好型全球价值链, 全球价值链, 隐含碳, 制造业环境友好型生产

Abstract: By making use of the world input-output tables and their environmental accounts, this paper proposes the calculation method of the position index of environmental friendly global value chain (GVC). On the basis of carbon productivity and the position index of GVC, it defines the added value of embodied carbon per unit in exports, the indirect added value of embodied carbon per unit in exports and the foreign added value of foreign embodied carbon per unit in exports. Taking the manufacturing industries in China and USA as an example, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of the GVC position index and the environmental friendly GVC position index from the four levels: high-tech manufacturing industry, middle high-tech manufacturing industry, lower middle-tech manufacturing industry and low-tech manufacturing industry. The results show that the industrial development level of China's high-tech manufacturing industry is far from that of the USA, while the difference between the environmental friendly production levels of high-tech manufacturing industries both in China and in the USA is relatively small. The development of China's middle high-tech manufacturing industry, lower middle-tech manufacturing industry and low-tech manufacturing industry depends mostly on carbon emissions, and is mostly at the expense of the environment; besides, the levels of environmental friendly production are weaker. However, the production level of a small number of low-tech manufacturing industries in China, such as wood and wood products (excluding furniture), straw and knitting products, printing and duplication of recorded media, are more environmentally friendly than that in the USA since 2008.

Key words: environmental friendly global value chain, global value chain, embodied carbon, environmental friendly production of manufacturing industry

中图分类号:

F752

桑丹丹, 王元月, 丁黎黎. 中美制造业环境友好型全球价值链地位的测算——基于世界投入产出表及其环境账户[J]. 当代财经, 2020, 0(8): 101-113.

SANG Dan-dan, WANG Yuan-yue, DING Li-li. Estimation of the Environmental Friendly Global Value Chain Position for China and USA Manufacturing Industries: Based on World Input-Output Tables and Their Environmental Accounts[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2020, 0(8): 101-113.

参考文献

[1] Yu C., Luo Z.What Are China's Real Gains within Global Value Chains? Measuring Domestic Value Added in China's Exports of Manufactures[J]. China Economic Review, 2018, 47(2): 263-273.
[2] MarjanoviV., milovaneviM., MladenoviI. Prediction of GDP Growth Rate Based on Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Emissions[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2018, 16(12): 212-217.
[3] Weitzel M., Ma T.Emissions Embodied in Chinese Exports Taking into Account the Special Export Structure of China[J]. Energy Economy, 2014, 45(9): 45-52.
[4] Yan Y.F., Yang L. K. China's Foreign Trade and Climate Change: A Case Study of CO₂ Emissions[J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 350-356.
[5] Copeland B.R., Taylor M. S. North-South Trade and Global Environment[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, 109(3): 755-787.
[6] Peters G.P., Hertwich E. G. CO₂ Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(5): 1401-1407.
[7] Hummels D., Ishii J., Yi K.M. The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2001, 54(1): 75-96.
[8] Koopman R., Powers W., Wang Z., Wei S.Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No.16426, 2010.
[9] Wang Z., Wei S., Zhu K.Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No.19677, 2013.
[10] Wang Z., Wei S., Yu X., Zhu K.Measures of Participation in Global Value Chains and Global Business Cycles[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No.23222, 2017.
[11] 戴枫,周天怡. GVC视角下双边增加值贸易的解构与测算:以中美贸易为例[J]. 审计与经济研究,2018,(4):1-11.
[12] 尹伟华. 中国制造业产品全球价值链的分解分析——基于世界投入产出表视角[J]. 世界经济研究,2016,(1):66-75.
[13] 周升起,桑丹丹,范云飞. 中国货物出口与服务贸易关联性——基于增加值贸易(TiVA)视角的研究[J]. 商业研究,2017,(12):99-110.
[14] 沈静,曹媛媛. 全球价值链绿色化的概念性认知及其研究框架[J]. 地理科学进展,2019,(10):1462-1472.
[15] 彭水军,张文城,孙传旺. 中国生产侧和消费侧碳排放量测算及影响因素研究[J]. 经济研究,2015,(1):168-182.
[16] 江洪. 金砖国家对外贸易隐含碳的测算与比较——基于投入产出模型和结构分解的实证分析[J]. 资源科学,2016,(12):2326-2337.
[17] 吕延方,崔兴华,王冬. 全球价值链参与度与贸易隐含碳[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2019,(2):45-65.
[18] Sun C., Li Z., Ma T., He R.Carbon Efciency and International Specialization Position: Evidence from Global Value Chain Position Index of Manufacture[J]. Energy Policy, 2019, 128(5): 235-242.
[19] 吕越,吕云龙. 中国参与全球价值链的环境效应分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2019,(7):91-100.
[20] Zhang Z., Xi L., Bin S., Yuhuan Z., Song W., Ya L., Hao S., Yongfeng Z., Ashfaq A., Guang S.Energy, CO₂ Emissions, and Value Added Flows Embodied in the International Trade of the BRICS Group: A Comprehensive Assessment[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 116(2): 1-12.
[21] 钱志权,杨来科,蒋琴儿. 全球价值链背景下中国出口增加值隐含碳测度与结构分解[J]. 亚太经济,2019,(5):59-67+150-151.
[22] Zhao Y., Liu Y., Zhan Z., Wan S., Li H., Ahmad, A. CO₂ Emissions per Value Added in Exports of China: A Comparison with USA Based on Generalized Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index Decomposition[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 144(2): 287-298.
[23] Kaya Y., Yokobori K. Environment, Energy,Economy: Strategies for Sustainability[M]. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 1997.
[24] 郑义,戴永务,刘燕娜. 低碳贸易竞争力指数的构建及中国实证[J]. 国际贸易问题,2015,(1):145-155.
[25] 胡剑波,郭风. 对外贸易碳排放竞争力指数构建与应用——基于中国投入产出数据的实证研究[J]. 中央财经大学学报,2018,(1):121-128.
[26] 胡剑波,任香,高鹏. 中国省际贸易、国际贸易与低碳贸易竞争力的测度研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2019,(9):42-60.
[27] 柳杨青. 可持续发展经济学的形成与创新[J]. 华东经济管理,2003,(1):36-39.
[28] 毛日昇. 中国制造业贸易竞争力及其决定因素分析[J]. 管理世界,2006,(8):65-75.
[29] 郭晶,刘菲菲. 中国服务业国际竞争力的重新估算——基于贸易增加值视角的研究[J]. 世界经济研究,2015,(2):52-60+128.
[30] 吴晓华,李磊. 中国碳生产率与能源效率省际差异及提升潜力[J]. 经济地理,2014,(5):105-108.
[31] 王垒,赵忠超,刘新民,范柳. 政府财政配置能力与外资参与程度对碳经济绩效的驱动效应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2018,(4):55-67.
[32] 张朕,周京奎,蔡礼辉. 中日印制造业全球价值链分工与地位的比较研究[J]. 经济问题探索,2019,(8):116-126+168.
[33] Grossman G.M., Krueger A. B. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3914, 1991.
[34] Busse M.Trade, Environmental Regulations and the World Trade Organization: New Empirical Evidence[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2004, 38(2): 285-306.
[35] 王垒,曲晶,赵忠超,丁黎黎. 组织绩效期望差距与异质机构投资者行为选择:双重委托代理视角[J]. 管理世界,2020,(7):132-152.