当代财经 ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (07): 554-.

• • 上一篇    

政策激励、知识累积与清洁技术偏向——基于中国汽车行业省际面板数据的分析

王俊1,2,刘丹2   

  1. (1. 华中科技大学 经济学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 湖南科技大学 商学院,湖南 湘潭 411201)
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:王 俊,华中科技大学博士研究生,湖南科技大学讲师,主要从事人口资源与环境经济研究,联系方式wangjunhnust@126.com;刘 丹,湖南科技大学博士研究生,主要从事企业管理与技术创新研究。

Policy Incentives, Knowledge Accumulation and Biased Clean Technology: An Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data of China’s Auto Industry

WANG Jun1,2, LIU Dan1   

  1. (1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074; 2. Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China)
  • Received:2015-01-11 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 为了探讨促使厂商研发转向清洁技术的影响因素,运用我国2001-2013年的汽车专利申请量等数据,分析偏向新能源汽车技术创新的政策激励和知识累积的影响。结论表明:(1)清洁产品的市场培育政策和环境治理政策对传统技术和清洁技术的创新均产生了正向作用,但政府对汽车技术的研发资助政策影响不显著;(2)政策激励没有导致清洁技术对传统技术的替代效应,环境治理型政策对清洁技术创新有更大的影响,清洁技术偏向的政策效应对于汽车行业而言有待观察;(3)技术创新具有显著的路径依赖特征,外部技术对部门内技术创新有正向的知识溢出效应,部门内两种技术的交互作用效应显著,其中传统技术对清洁技术有溢出效应,清洁技术却对传统技术有抑制效应。

关键词: 政策激励,清洁技术,技术创新

Abstract: To explore the influential factors in promoting firms to develop clean technology, this paper tries to analyze the impacts of policy incentives and knowledge accumulation on the biased new energy automotive technology innovation by using the patent application data of China’s auto industry during 2001-2013. The results show that: (1) the market cultivation policy for clean products and the environmental governance policy have generated positive effects on the innovation of both traditional technology and clean technology, but the government’s R&D subsidy policy for automotive technology has no significant effect; (2) the policy incentives have not resulted in the substitution effects of clean technology for the traditional technology, the environmental governance policy has produced more influence on the clean technology innovation, while the policy effect of the biased clean technology on the auto industry remains to be seen; (3) technology innovation has significant characteristics of path dependence, the external technology has positive knowledge spillover effects on the internal technology innovation, and the two kinds of internal technologies have significant interactive effects, in which the traditional technology has spillover effects on the clean technology while the clean technology has inhibitory effects on the traditional technology.

Key words: policy incentives; clean technology; technology innovation