当代财经 ›› 2014, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (02): 1662-.

• • 上一篇    

反垄断实施宽严特征研究:一个分析框架

王自力,王岳龙,阮敏   

  1. (江西财经大学 产业经济研究院/规制与竞争研究中心,江西 南昌 330013)
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-17 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:王自力,江西财经大学教授,经济学博士,主要从事反垄断和法经济学研究,联系方式13077958258@163.com;王岳龙,江西财经大学讲师,经济学博士,主要从事计量经济学研究;阮 敏,江西财经大学副教授,经济学博士,主要从事产业经济学研究。

An Analysis of the Characters of Antitrust Enforcement: An Analytical Frame

WANG Zi-li, WANG Yue-long, RUAN Min   

  1. (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)
  • Received:2013-06-17 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 中国反垄断实施的宽严问题一直是业内争议的一个焦点,但从现有文献看,对这个问题还缺乏规范和系统的研究。通过引入执法决策的积极失误成本和消极失误成本概念,建立最优执法标准决定模型,可确立衡量反垄断执法宽严变化的标准。通过对各变量对最优执法标准的影响机理分析,可得出反垄断执法标准的宽严受市场制度、法制环境、执法投入、执法效率和执法收益等因素影响。中国当前反垄断执法较为宽松的重要原因是执法供给能力不足,并具有结构性、相对性、阶段性等特征。现阶段中国的反垄断执法应采用宽严相济的政策组合工具,加强反垄断执法能力建设,建立执法机构协调机制,构建反垄断与管制行业分类监管体制,淡化反行政垄断职能。

关键词: 反垄断执法,失误成本,执法标准,法经济学分析

Abstract: The leniency or harshness in the enforcement of China’s antitrust law has been widely regarded as a focus of debates. The existing literature shows that there is not yet a normalized and systematic research on such issue. By introducing the concepts of positive and negative costs of antitrust enforcement, this paper sets up a model to decide the optimal law enforcement standard, which can establish the standard to measure the changes of antitrust enforcement. Through the analysis of the influencing mechanism of different variables on the optimal enflrcement standard, it can be seen that the leniency or harshness of the standard of antitrust enforcement is subject to such influencing factors as market environment, legal system, enforcement input, efficiency of enforcement, and benefit of enforcement. The major reason why China’s present antitrust enforcement is relatively lenient is that the enforcement lacks sufficient supply capacity with such characteristics as constitutive property, relativety and stage. At the present stage, China’s antitrust enforcement should adopt a moderate policy mix tool, enhance the ability of antitrust enforcement, establish a coordinative mechanism for the enforcement agencies, construct the classfied supervision system for the antitrust and regulated industries, and dilute the function of anti-administrative monopoly.

Key words: antitrust enforcement; fault cost; enforcement standard; analysis of the economics of law