江西财经大学学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 525-.

• • 上一篇    

“诺斯第二悖论”再破解

龚立新,傅 鹏   

  1. (江西财经大学 经济学院,江西 南昌 330013)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:龚立新,江西财经大学教授,经济学博士,主要从事新制度经济学、政治经济学研究,联系方式gonglixing@sina.com;傅 鹏,江西财经大学研究生,主要从事新制度经济学研究。

A Further Interpretation of “the Second North Paradox”

GONG Li-xin, FU Peng   

  1. (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: “诺斯第二悖论”是我国学者在本世纪初提出的一个关于经济增长、制度变迁与交易费用三者间存在着某些矛盾性结论的问题描述。如果把总量交易费用与单笔交易费用之间的深层关系厘清,其实“诺斯第二悖论”并不存在,并且还能得出以下结论:(1)衡量制度变迁的标准应为单笔交易费用的高低,而非总量的多少;(2)总量交易费用可以划分为制度费用以及制度既定条件下市场交易费用之和,并且总量交易费用的上升有助于单笔交易费用的下降;(3)总量交易费用占GDP的比例并不会无限上升,而且总量交易费用的上升与单笔交易费用的下降只在某一范围内并存。

关键词: the Second North Paradox, the cost of a single transaction, total transaction costs, institutional changes

Abstract: “The Second North Paradox”is a problem description of some contradictory conclusions existing among economic growth, institutional changes and transaction costs, which was proposed by domestic scholars in the beginning of this century. If the deep relation between the total transaction costs and the cost of a single transaction is clarified, “the Second North Paradox”does not exist at all. In addition, the following conclusions can be drawn: firstly, the standard to measure the institutional changes should be the level of a single transaction cost, rather than the total transaction costs; secondly, the total transaction costs can be divided into two parts: the institutional costs and the sum of market transaction costs under the established institutional system; besides, the rise in the total transaction costs helps to decrease the cost of a single transaction cost; thirdly, the proportion of the total transaction costs to GDP will not rise infinitely, meanwhile, the decrease of single transaction costs and the rise of the total transaction costs will co-exist only within a certain range.

Key words: 诺斯第二悖论;单笔交易费用;总量交易费用;制度变迁