江西财经大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (03): 294-.

• • 上一篇    

别嘌醇片垄断协议案行政处罚的法律适用问题探究——基于《反垄断法》第46条的规范分析

蒋岩波,肖秀娟   

  1. (江西财经大学 法学院,江西 南昌 330013)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:蒋岩波,江西财经大学教授,江西政府法治研究中心研究员,主要从事经济法学研究;肖秀娟,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事经济法学研究,通讯作者联系方式billyxxj@163.com。

Probe into the Legal Application Problem of the Administrative Penalty for the Case of Allopurinol Tablets Monopoly Agreement: A Normative Analysis Based on Article 46 of The Anti-Monopoly Law

JIANG Yan-bo, XIAO Xiu-juan   

  1. (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 经营者达成并实施限制竞争的垄断协议行为,是各国反垄断法律重点规制的经济性垄断行为之一。2016年2月,国家发改委发布了对国内五家药企达成别嘌醇片垄断协议案的行政处罚决定。对照中国《反垄断法》第46条对垄断协议行为行政责任的规定,国家发改委的处罚决定存在罚款比例和数额过低、没收违法所得处罚缺失和缺乏对违法行为的结果有效纠正措施等问题,致使《反垄断法》规制违法垄断行为的立法规范和立法目的在具体个案中不能实现。有鉴于此,应当加强中国三大反垄断执法机关之间的协调,统一反垄断执法的理念;制定具体的、合理的罚款标准和没收违法所得的认定标准,指导反垄断执法机关的反垄断执法工作;细化具体的违法垄断行为不良后果的救济措施。通过以上三个方面的工作,进一步规范和完善中国的反垄断执法,形成对实施垄断违法行为经营者的有效威慑,保护消费者的利益。

关键词: 别嘌醇片,垄断协议,法律适用,规范分析

Abstract: To reach and implement the monopoly agreement to restrict competition by the operators is one of the economic monopolistic acts that are regulated heavily by the anti-monopoly law of every country. In February 2016, the National Development and Reform Commission issued an administrative penalty decision on the case of allopurinol tablets monopoly agreement reached by five domestic pharmaceutical companies. Compared with the provisions of Article 46 of Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law on the administrative responsibilities of the monopoly agreement, there exist such problems in the penalty made by the NDRC as lower proportion and amount of the penalty, lacking of the penalty of confiscation for the illegal gains, lacking of effective corrective measures for the illegal acts, and so on, so that the legislative norms and legislative purposes to regulate illegal monopoly behaviors by the Anti-Monopoly Law cannot be achieved in specific cases. In view of this, we should strengthen the coordination among the three major anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies in China and unify the concepts of anti-monopoly law enforcement, develop specific and reasonable penalty standards and recognition standards for confiscation of illegal income, guide the anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies to carry out their anti-monopoly work, and detail the relief measures for the bad consequences of illegal monopoly behaviors. Through the above three aspects of the work, we can further standardize and improve China’s anti-monopoly law enforcement, form the effective deterrence against the operators who conduct illegal monopoly behaviors, so as to protect the interests of consumers.

Key words: allopurinol tablets; monopoly agreements; legal application; normative analysis