Research on the Measurement, Spatial Differentiation and Convergence of the Modernization Level of China’s Cultural Industry Chain

Abstract

Abstract: Improving the modernization level of the cultural industry chain has become an important measure to promote the transformation and upgrading of China’s cultural industry and build a cultural power. By scientifically defining the connotation of the modernization of the cultural industry chain, refining the core elements of the modernization of the cultural industry chain, measuring the modernization level of the national and provincial cultural industry chain from 2012 to 2021, this paper explores the spatial differentiation and convergence of the modernization level of the cultural industry chain by using the methods of kernel density estimation, Dagum gini coefficient and convergence model. The findings show that: firstly, during the observation period, the modernization level of the national cultural industry chain generally presents a fluctuating upward trend, and the regional differences in the modernization level of the cultural industry chain shows a narrowing trend. Secondly, there is a phenomenon of “club convergence” in the modernization level of provincial cultural industry chain during the observation period, and it is difficult for low-level areas to achieve a transition to a higher development type because there exists a spatial crowding out effect during the convergence procedure. Thirdly, the modernization level of the national cultural industry chain has significantly converged during the observation period. According to the research conclusion, we should further enhance the innovation efficiency of the national cultural industry chain, strengthen the research and development of the core technology of the cultural industry, further expand the market scale of digital cultural products and the cardinal number of cultural enterprises in the northeast and western regions, optimize the spatial layout of the national cultural resource elements, and guide the benign and coordinated development of the modernization of the regional cultural industry chain.

Key words: modernization of cultural industry chain, regional development, spatial differentiation, convergence

CLC Number:

F222.3

WEI He-qing, HU Shi-zhong, WU Lei. Research on the Measurement, Spatial Differentiation and Convergence of the Modernization Level of China’s Cultural Industry Chain[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2024, 0(10): 123-140.

References

[1] 黄群慧, 倪红福. 基于价值链理论的产业基础能力与产业链水平提升研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2020, (5): 11-21.
[2] 江小涓. 数字时代的技术与文化[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021, (8): 4-34+204.
[3] 黎峰. 双重价值链嵌入下的中国省级区域角色——一个综合理论分析框架[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020, (1): 136-154.
[4] 李金昌, 史龙梅, 徐蔼婷. 高质量发展评价指标体系探讨[J]. 统计研究, 2019, (1): 4-14.
[5] 李胜会, 戎芳毅. 产业链现代化的渐进逻辑:破解锁定与韧性提升[J]. 广东社会科学, 2022, (5): 37-47.
[6] 林晶, 吴赐联, 甘健胜. 地区产业链现代化指数测算及障碍诊断[J]. 三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023, (1): 78-85.
[7] 刘秉镰, 秦文晋. 中国经济高质量发展水平的空间格局与动态演进[J]. 中国软科学, 2022, (1): 62-75.
[8] 刘志彪. 产业链现代化的产业经济学分析[J]. 经济学家, 2019, (12): 5-13.
[9] 罗仲伟, 孟艳华. “十四五”时期区域产业基础高级化和产业链现代化[J]. 区域经济评论, 2020, (1): 32-38.
[10] 吕越. 新时代如何提升产业链供应链韧性和安全水平[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2023, (1): 98-108.
[11] 毛冰. 中国产业链现代化水平指标体系构建与综合测度[J]. 经济体制改革, 2022, (2): 114-120.
[12] 孟祺. 产业政策与产业链现代化——基于“链长制”政策的视角[J]. 财经科学, 2023, (3): 93-107.
[13] 聂长飞, 简新华. 中国高质量发展的测度及省际现状的分析比较[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2020, (2): 26-47.
[14] 邱灵. 着力提升产业链供应链韧性和安全水平[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2023, (1): 33-39.
[15] 任保平, 张陈璇. 数字产业链助推中国产业链现代化的效应、机制与路径[J]. 财经科学, 2023, (2): 54-64.
[16] 孙畅, 吴芬. 中国高端服务业与先进制造业匹配发展的空间分异及收敛性[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2020, (12): 3-24.
[17] 王克岭, 陈微, 李俊. 基于分工视角的文化产业链研究述评[J]. 经济问题探索, 2013, (3): 167-172.
[18] 徐华. 三次产业协同发展机制及其产业政策[J]. 中国经济问题, 2010, (6): 34-41.
[19] 徐雪, 王永瑜. 中国乡村振兴水平测度、区域差异分解及动态演进[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, (5): 64-83.
[20] 徐忠华. 基于产业链视角的中国文化产业整合研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2020.
[21] 姚树俊, 董哲铭. 中国产业链供应链现代化水平测度与空间动态演进[J]. 中国流通经济, 2023, (3): 32-47.
[22] 袁渊, 于凡. 文化产业高质量发展水平测度与评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, (21): 62-66.
[23] 张虎, 韩爱华, 杨青龙. 中国制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚的空间效应分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2017, (2): 3-20.
[24] 郑江淮, 陈喆, 冉征. 创新集群的“中心—外围结构”:技术互补与经济增长收敛性研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, (1): 66-86.
[25] 朱俊. 系统耦合协同评价模型的改进及其应用[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, (11): 25-31.
[26] Dagum C.A new approach to the decomposition of the gini income inequality ratio[J]. Empirical Economics, 1997, 22(4): 515-531.
[27] Miller R E, Temurshoev U.Output upstreamness and input downstreamness of industries/countries in world production[J]. International Regional Science Review, 2017, 40(5): 443-475.