当代财经 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (12): 114-128.

• 产业与贸易 • 上一篇    下一篇

梯度培育政策下专精特新企业内生发展动力机制研究

谌飞龙, 王光华   

  1. 江西财经大学 工商管理学院/产业集群与企业发展研究中心,江西 南昌 330013
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-11 修回日期:2025-11-20 出版日期:2025-12-15 发布日期:2025-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 谌飞龙,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,管理学博士,主要从事专精特新企业发展研究,联系方式 gacflong@163.com。
  • 作者简介:王光华,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事专精特新企业发展研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“主配协同视角下‘专精特新’企业要素品牌化实现路径研究”(24BGL121)

Research on the Endogenous Development Dynamics Mechanism of the Specialized, Refined, Distinctive, and Innovative Enterprises under the Gradient Cultivation Policy

Chen Fei-long, Wang Guang-hua   

  1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
  • Received:2025-02-11 Revised:2025-11-20 Online:2025-12-15 Published:2025-12-10

摘要: 破解中小企业“专精特新”转型的内生发展动力难题,对构建自主可控的现代化产业体系具有重大战略价值。基于2011—2024年中央各部委发布的86份专精特新企业培育政策文本,融合NVivo12高频词统计、动态主题模型(DTM)与扎根理论研究法,揭示梯度培育政策驱动专精特新企业内生发展的深层机制。研究发现:政策体系呈现“技术孵化—能力精进—生态赋能”的动态演进特征,精准适配专精特新企业的梯度能力需求;政策工具通过“目标设定(引导作用)—资源适配(支持作用)—动力激活(推动作用)”传导路径,驱动企业形成由人力资本、技术创新、生产方式与品牌市场四大动力要素递进耦合、循环作用,协同促进专精特新企业发展的动力机制。进一步分析显示,该动力机制在专精特新三类梯度企业中存在显著差异,创新型企业表现为“外生依赖型”,专精特新中小企业表现为“传导阻滞型”,专精特新“小巨人”企业表现为“反哺闭环型”。有鉴于此,建议未来政策以企业内生发展需求为锚点,结合内生发展动力要素及其协同机制精准施策,注重分梯度设计与动态治理相结合,提升政策落地效能。

关键词: 专精特新企业, 梯度培育, 内生发展动力, 政策文本分析, 动态主题模型

Abstract: Identifying the endogenous drivers behind the transformation of small and medium-sized enterprises toward“Specialized, Refined, Distinctive and Innovative”(SRDI) enterprises is of profound strategic significance for building a self-sufficient and secure modern industrial system. Based on the 86 policy texts on the cultivation of specialized, refined, unique, and innovative enterprises issued by various central ministries and commissions from 2011 to 2024, this study integrates NVivo12 high-frequency word statistics, Dynamic Topic Model (DTM), and Grounded Theory research method to reveal the deep mechanism of gradient cultivation policies driving the endogenous development of the specialized, refined, unique, and innovative enterprises. The research findings show that the policy system exhibits a dynamic evolutionary characteristic of“technology incubation - capability enhancement - ecosystem empowerment”, precisely adapting to the gradient capability needs of the specialized, refined, unique, and innovative enterprises. Through a transmission path of“target setting (guiding role) - resource adaptation (supporting role) - motivation activation (promoting role)”, policy instruments drive the enterprises to form a dynamic mechanism for the development of specialized, refined, unique, and innovative enterprises, which involves the progressive coupling and cyclic interaction of four driving elements: human capital, technological innovation, production methods, and brand market. Further analysis reveals that significant differences in this dynamic mechanism exist among the three types of gradient enterprises: specialized, refined, unique, and innovative enterprises. Innovative enterprises exhibit an“exogenous dependency”pattern; specialized, refined, unique, and innovative SMEs demonstrate a“conduction block”pattern; and specialized, refined, unique, and innovative“little giant”enterprises show a“feedback loop”pattern. In light of this, it is recommended that future policies anchor around the endogenous development needs of enterprises, precisely implement strategies in conjunction with endogenous driving factors and their synergistic mechanisms, and focus on combining gradient design with dynamic governance to enhance the effectiveness of policy implementation.

Key words: specialized,refined,distinctive and innovative enterprises, gradient cultivation, endogenous development dynamics, policy text analysis, dynamic topic model

中图分类号: