年长员工代际知识分享对工作繁荣的影响研究——基于自我决定理论视角

当代财经 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (10): 98-112.

年长员工代际知识分享对工作繁荣的影响研究——基于自我决定理论视角

万漪¹, 占小军¹, 韩雪²

1.江西财经大学工商管理学院,江西南昌 330013;
2.合肥工业大学管理学院/过程优化与智能决策教育部重点实验室,安徽合肥 230009

收稿日期:2025-02-07 修回日期:2025-06-04 出版日期:2025-10-15 发布日期:2025-10-23
通讯作者: 韩雪,合肥工业大学讲师,管理学博士,主要从事组织行为与人力资源管理研究,联系方式2024800080@hfut.edu.cn。
作者简介:万漪,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事组织行为与人力资源管理研究;占小军,江西财经大学教授,管理学博士,主要从事组织行为与人力资源管理研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“VUCA时代的韧性领导：结构体系、形成机制、双刃剑效应与应用开发研究”（72362019）; 合肥工业大学学术新人提升计划A项目（JZ2025HGTA0168）; 合肥工业大学青年教师科研创新启动专项 A（JZ2024HGQA0650）

Research on the Impact of Intergenerational Knowledge Sharing among Older Employees on Job Flourishing: From the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory

Wan Yi¹, Zhan Xiao-jun¹, Han Xue²

1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013;
2. Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2025-02-07 Revised:2025-06-04 Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着职场员工老龄化现象的日益加剧,如何激发年长员工在职业生涯后期的工作活力与学习动力以推动其实现工作繁荣,已成为应对人口老龄化背景下组织管理的重要议题。基于自我决定理论,探讨年长员工代际知识分享对其工作繁荣的影响及其作用机制和边界条件,并对三阶段330份有效问卷进行数据分析。结果显示,年长员工代际知识分享能促进其工作繁荣;心理需求满足在其中起中介作用;感知年轻员工知识吸收能力不仅正向调节年长员工代际知识分享与心理需求满足之间的关系,还正向调节年长员工代际知识分享通过心理需求满足影响其工作繁荣的间接效应。因此,企业应鼓励年长员工积极参与代际互动,重视个体心理需求满足在年长员工实现工作繁荣过程中的重要作用,关注并提升年轻员工的知识吸收能力。

关键词: 年长员工, 代际知识分享, 心理需求满足, 工作繁荣, 年轻员工知识吸收能力

Abstract: With the increasing aging of the workforce, how to stimulate the work vitality and learning motivation of older employees in the later stages of their careers to promote their job prosperity has become an important issue in organizational management in the context of population aging. Based on the self-determination theory, this study explores the impact of intergenerational knowledge sharing among older employees on their job prosperity, as well as its mechanism and boundary conditions. Data analysis is conducted on 330 valid questionnaires collected across three stages. The results show that intergenerational knowledge sharing among older employees can promote their job prosperity, that psychological needs satisfaction plays a mediating role, and that perceived knowledge absorption ability of younger employees not only positively moderates the relationship between intergenerational knowledge sharing among older employees and psychological needs satisfaction, but also positively moderates the indirect effect of intergenerational knowledge sharing among older employees on their job prosperity through psychological needs satisfaction. Therefore, organizations should encourage older employees to actively participate in intergenerational interactions, emphasize the important role of individual psychological needs satisfaction in achieving job prosperity among older employees, and pay attention to and enhance the knowledge absorption ability of younger employees.

Key words: older employees, intergenerational knowledge sharing, psychological needs satisfaction, job enrichment, knowledge absorption ability of younger employees

中图分类号:

F272.92

万漪, 占小军, 韩雪. 年长员工代际知识分享对工作繁荣的影响研究——基于自我决定理论视角[J]. 当代财经, 2025, 0(10): 98-112.

Wan Yi, Zhan Xiao-jun, Han Xue. Research on the Impact of Intergenerational Knowledge Sharing among Older Employees on Job Flourishing: From the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2025, 0(10): 98-112.

参考文献

[1] 崔国东. 重新探讨工作中成功老龄化的内涵、前因及结果:基于代际互动视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, (10): 1593-1609.
[2] 戴万亮, 苏琳, 杨皎平. 心理所有权、知识分享与团队成员创新行为——同事间信任的跨层次调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2020, (12): 246-256.
[3] 邓志华, 肖小虹, 杨均. 精神型领导对员工工匠精神的影响研究——心理需求满足和工作价值观的不同作用[J]. 华东经济管理, 2021, (2): 120-128.
[4] 窦军生, 李生校, 邬家瑛. “家和”真能“万事”兴吗?——基于企业家默会知识代际转移视角的一个实证检验[J]. 管理世界, 2009, (1): 108-120.
[5] 蓝媛媛, 屈晓婷, 夏宇寰. 服务型领导对员工创造力的影响: 知识分享的中介作用与价值观一致性的调节作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2020, (11): 37-49.
[6] 李青原, 李厚渊, 陈昶宜, 等. 组织内社交资本与员工韧性——来自企业组织内部通信的证据[J]. 当代财经, 2025, (2): 70-83.
[7] 林忠, 侯鑫远, 夏福斌, 等. 家长式领导与员工工作繁荣关系研究: 工作—家庭增益的中介效应[J]. 中国软科学, 2021, (10): 115-125.
[8] 刘善仕, 玉胜贤, 刘嫦娥. 投桃报李:临时员工助人行为对正式员工隐性知识分享的影响机制[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2024, (6): 54-67.
[9] 陆云燕, 周浩. 欲说还休:年长员工代际知识转移研究述评[J]. 人力资源管理评论,2021, (2): 89-104.
[10] 钱智超, 闻效仪. 数字技术应用对团队适应性绩效的影响研究[J]. 当代财经, 2025, (7): 88-99.
[11] 宋萌, 高源, 胡鹤颜, 等. 薪火何以相传?知识导向人力资源管理对年长员工知识分享的影响[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2023, (3): 37-50.
[12] 汪长玉, 左美云. 代际和同辈知识转移对年轻员工创新行为的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018, (6): 893-900.
[13] 王忠军, 张丽瑶, 杨茵茵, 等. 职业生涯晚期工作重塑与工作中成功老龄化[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, (9): 1643-1655.
[14] 杨陈, 杨付, 景熠, 等. 谦卑型领导如何改善员工绩效:心理需求满足的中介作用和工作单位结构的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, (2): 121-134.
[15] 张爽, 陈晨. 创新氛围对创新绩效的影响——知识吸收能力的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2022, (6): 113-120.
[16] 赵富强, 许通, 陈耘, 等. 数智型员工关系管理对算法公民行为的影响研究——数据向善与工作繁荣的作用[J]. 珞珈管理评论, 2025, (2): 16-32.
[17] 赵富强, 祝含秋, 陈耘, 等. 多团队成员身份对个体创新绩效的双刃剑效应研究[J]. 管理学报, 2024, (1): 66-76.
[18] 周浩, 陆云燕. 爱屋才能及乌? 类亲情交换视角下组织政治知觉对知识分享的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2024, (9): 141-150.
[19] 祝养浩, 龙立荣, 刘文兴. 领导感激表达能提高员工的追随行为吗?情绪表达真诚性的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, (7): 1160-1175.
[20] Bartol K M, Srivastava A.Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2002, 9(1): 64-76.
[21] Burmeister A, Fasbender U, Deller J.Being perceived as a knowledge sender or knowledge receiver: A multistudy investigation of the effect of age on knowledge transfer[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2018, 91(3): 518-545.
[22] Burmeister A, Wang M, Hirschi A.Understanding the motivational benefits of knowledge transfer for older and younger workers in age-diverse coworker dyads: An actor-partner interdependence model[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2020, 105(7): 748-759.
[23] Chiniara M, Bentein K.Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2016, 27(1): 124-141.
[24] Connelly C E, Zweig D, Webster J, et al.Knowledge hiding in organizations[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33(1): 64-88.
[25] Fasbender U, Gerpott F H.To share or not to share: A social-cognitive internalization model to explain how age discrimination impairs older employees' knowledge sharing with younger colleagues[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2021, 30(1): 125-142.
[26] Fasbender U, Gerpott F H.Knowledge transfer between younger and older employees: A temporal social comparison model[J]. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2022, 8(2): 146-162.
[27] Fasbender U, Gerpott F H, Unger D.Give and take? Knowledge exchange between older and younger employees as a function of generativity and development striving[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2021, 25(10): 2420-2443.
[28] Pfrombeck J, Burmeister A, Grote G.Older workers' knowledge seeking from younger coworkers: Disentangling countervailing pathways to successful aging at work[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2024, 45(1): 1-20.
[29] Porath C, Spreitzer G, Gibson C, et al.Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33(2): 250-275.
[30] Ryan R M, Deci E L.Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being[J]. American Psychologist, 2000, 55(1): 68-78.
[31] Spreitzer G, Sutcliffe K, Dutton J, et al.A socially embedded model of thriving at work[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(5): 537-549.
[32] Srivastava A, Bartol K M, Locke E A.Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(6): 1239-1251.
[33] Van den Broeck A, Vansteenkiste M, De Witte H, et al. Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2010, 83(4): 981-1002.
[34] Wang C Y, Zhang Y M, Feng J J.How do older employees achieve successful ageing at work through generativity in the digital workplace? A self-affirmation perspective[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2024, 97(4): 1475-1501.
[35] Zhu Y Q, Chiu H, Infante Holguin-Veras E J. It is more blessed to give than to receive: Examining the impact of knowledge sharing on sharers and recipients[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2018, 22(1): 76-91.