当代财经 ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (11): 500-.

• • 上一篇    

基于管理策略的中国上市银行经营效率及风险效率比较与评价

章贵军,罗良清   

  1. (江西财经大学 统计学院/应用统计研究中心,江西 南昌 330013)
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-08 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:章贵军,江西财经大学讲师,博士,主要从事金融经济及能源与环境效率测度研究,联系方式 gj_zhang3417 @sina.com;罗良清,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事统计理论与应用研究。

Evaluation and Comparison between Operational Performance and Risk Performance of China’s Listed Banks Based on Management Strategy

ZHANG Gui-jun, LUO Liang-qing   

  1. (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)
  • Received:2015-04-08 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 基于管理策略的自然可处置和管理可处置非径向DEA(data envelopment analysis)方法,分别测度了中国16家上市银行2005-2012年间的经营效率和风险效率。研究结果表明:四大国有银行同股份制商业银行的经营效率与风险效率均存在显著差异;股份制商业银行的经营效率显著高于四大国有银行,而风险效率则显著低于四大国有银行;股份制商业银行和四大国有银行的经营效率均没有受到金融危机后更严格的金融管制影响;金融危机后,更严格的金融管制并没有影响股份制商业银行的风险效率,而四大国有银行的风险效率显著下降。

关键词: 自然可处置,管理可处置,非径向DEA,上市银行

Abstract: By applying the non-radial DEA method under natural disposability and managerial disposability based on the management strategy, this study measures the operational efficiency and risk efficiency of China’s 16 listed banks during the period of 2005-2012 respectively. The results show that there exist significant differences between the“four big”state-owned banks and the joint-stock banks in their operational efficiency and risk efficiency. The operational efficiency of the joint-stock banks is significantly higher than that of the“four big”state-owned banks while the risk efficiency of them is significantly lower than that of the“four big”state-owned banks. The operational efficiency of the joint-stock banks and the“four big”state-owned banks has not been impacted by the more stringent financial regulation after the financial crisis. After the financial crisis, the more stringent financial regulation has no impact on the risk performance of joint-stock banks, while the risk performance of the “four big” state-owned banks has been crippled.

Key words: natural disposability; managerial disposability; non-radial DEA ; listed banks