强化知识产权司法保护有助于企业创新吗——来自知识产权法院设立的证据

当代财经 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 16-27.

强化知识产权司法保护有助于企业创新吗——来自知识产权法院设立的证据

庄佳强, 王浩, 张文涛

中南财经政法大学财政税务学院,湖北武汉 430073

收稿日期:2020-03-05 修回日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2020-09-15 发布日期:2020-12-10
通讯作者: 庄佳强,中南财经政法大学副教授,经济学博士,主要从事宏观经济学、财税理论与政策研究,联系方式zjq981469@163.com
作者简介:王浩,中南财经政法大学博士研究生,主要从事财政理论与政策研究;张文涛,中南财经政法大学博士研究生,主要从事财政理论与政策研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金一般项目“区域异质性下中国县级政府偿债能力与举债空间测算研究”(16BJY153);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“限额管理下地方政府举债行为与债务期限管理”(2722020JCT006)

Does Strengthening the Juridical Protection of Intellectual Property Contribute to Corporate Innovation? Evidences from the Establishment of Courts for Intellectual Property Right Cases

ZHUANG Jia-qiang, WANG Hao, ZHANG Wen-tao

Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China

Received:2020-03-05 Revised:2020-06-16 Online:2020-09-15 Published:2020-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 强化知识产权司法保护对激发社会创新活力具有重要意义。2014年北京、上海和广州三地知识产权法院的设立,为研究知识产权司法保护强化对企业创新的影响提供了一个准自然实验场景。基于2007—2016年222个地级市的2155家上市公司数据的实证分析表明,我国知识产权保护水平仍处于“最优知识产权论”的有效创新激励阶段,知识产权法院设立对于知识产权保护法治的强化显著地促进了企业创新。知识产权法院通过优化自主创新司法环境、激励企业研发投入、减少企业研发收益损失等机制促进了企业创新。因此,强化知识产权保护立法与执法联动、推进知识产权保护司法机构专门化是完善我国知识产权法治体系、进一步促进社会创新的有力举措。

关键词: 知识产权法院, 企业创新, 研发激励

Abstract: Strengthening the judicial protection of intellectual property rights is of great significance to stimulate the vitality of social innovation. The establishments of intellectual property right courts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou in 2014 have provided the scenario of quasi-natural experiment for the studies of the impacts of strengthening juridical protection of intellectual property on corporate innovation. The empirical analysis based on the data of 2155 listed companies in 222 prefecture-level cities from 2007 to 2016 reveals that the level of China's intellectual property rights protection is still at the efficient innovation motivation stage of“optimal intellectual property theory”, and that strengthening the rule of law for intellectual property rights protection by the establishment of intellectual property right courts has significantly promoted corporate innovation. The intellectual property courts have promoted corporate innovation through optimizing the juridical environment for independent innovation, encouraging enterprises' R&D investment, reducing the losses in corporate R&D profits and other mechanisms. Therefore, to strengthen the linkage between legislation and law enforcement of intellectual property rights protection and to promote the specialization of judicial institutions of intellectual property rights protection is a powerful measure to improve China's rule of law system for intellectual property rights and to further promote social innovations.

Key words: courts for intellectual property right cases, corporate innovation, R&D incentive

中图分类号:

庄佳强, 王浩, 张文涛. 强化知识产权司法保护有助于企业创新吗——来自知识产权法院设立的证据[J]. 当代财经, 2020, 0(9): 16-27.

ZHUANG Jia-qiang, WANG Hao, ZHANG Wen-tao. Does Strengthening the Juridical Protection of Intellectual Property Contribute to Corporate Innovation? Evidences from the Establishment of Courts for Intellectual Property Right Cases[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2020, 0(9): 16-27.

参考文献

[1] 董雪兵, 史晋川. 累积创新框架下的知识产权保护研究[J]. 经济研究, 2006, (5): 97-105.
[2] 尹志锋, 叶静怡, 黄阳华, 秦雪征. 知识产权保护与企业创新:传导机制及其检验[J]. 世界经济, 2013, (12): 111-129.
[3] 刘思明, 侯鹏, 赵彦云. 知识产权保护与中国工业创新能力——来自省级大中型工业企业面板数据的实证研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015, (3): 40-57.
[4] Lai L.C. International Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Rate of Product Innovation[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1998, 55(1): 133-153.
[5] Horii R., Iwaisako T.Economic Growth with Imperfect Protection of Intellectual Property Rights[J]. Journal of Economics, 2007, 90(1): 45-85.
[6] 王华. 更严厉的知识产权保护制度有利于技术创新吗?[J]. 经济研究, 2011, (2): 124-135.
[7] 吴超鹏, 唐菂. 知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2016, (11): 125-139.
[8] 龙小宁, 易巍, 林志帆. 知识产权保护的价值有多大?——来自中国上市公司专利数据的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, (8):120-136.
[9] 史宇鹏, 顾全林. 知识产权保护、异质性企业与创新:来自中国制造业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2013, (8): 136-149.
[10] 魏浩, 巫俊. 知识产权保护、进口贸易与创新型领军企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2018, (9): 91-106.
[11] 尹志锋. 专利诉讼经历与企业技术创新战略[J]. 世界经济, 2018, (10): 170-192.
[12] Anton J., Greene H., Yao D.A. Policy Implications of Weak Patent Rights[J]. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2006, (6): 1-26.
[13] Keller W.International Technology Diffusion[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, 42(3): 752-782.
[14] Park W.G. Chapter 9 Intellectual Property Rights and International Innovation[J]. Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, 2007, (2): 289-327.
[15] 吴汉东. 知识产权的多元属性及研究范式[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011, (5): 39-45.
[16] 沈国兵, 刘佳. TRIPS协定下中国知识产权保护水平和实际保护强度[J]. 财贸经济, 2009, (11): 66-71.
[17] 马一德. 创新驱动发展和知识产权战略实施[J]. 中国法学, 2013, (4): 27-38.
[18] Depoorter B. Intellectual Property Enforcement Costs[M]// Depoorter B., Menell P., Schwartz D. Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law,2019, Edward Elgar.
[19] Hall B. H., Lerner J. The Financing of R&D and Innovation[M]// Hall B., Rosenberg N. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation,2010, Elsevier.
[20] Liu Q., Wong K.P. Intellectual Capital and Financing Decisions: Evidence from the U.S. Patent Data[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(10): 1861-1878.
[21] Mann W.Creditor Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Patent Collateral[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2018, 130(1): 25-47.
[22] Ang J.S., Cheng Y., Wu C. Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China? Evidence from Financing and Investment Choices in the High-tech Industry[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2014, 96(2): 332-348.
[23] 徐珊. 区域知识溢出、产权性质与企业自主创新绩效——基于创新价值链的视角[J]. 当代财经, 2019, (2): 85-97.
[24] 最高人民法院知识产权法庭. 最高人民法院知识产权法庭年度报告2019[M]. 人民法院出版社, 2020.
[25] Moser P.How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs[J]. The American Economic Review, 2005, 95(4): 1214-1236.
[26] 赵阳, 王芳. 地方政府创新激励政策与企业创新绩效——来自党报与工业企业的经验证据[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, (2): 61-68.
[27] 李香菊, 杨欢. 财税激励政策、外部环境与企业研发投入——基于中国战略性新兴产业A股上市公司的实证研究[J]. 当代财经, 2019, (3): 25-36.