JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY FINANCE AND ECONOMICS ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 85-94.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Concept and Structural Dimensions of Humble Leadership in Chinese Organizational Situation: A Qualitative Research from the Follower-Centric Perspective

LI Shenglan1, WANG Biying2, GAO Riguang1   

  1. 1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013;
    2. Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
  • Online:2017-01-15 Published:2021-09-24
  • About author:Li Shenglan, Professor of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Ph.D, mainly engaged in research on human resource management. Wang Biying, Associate Professor of Jiangxi Normal University, Ph.D, mainly engaged in research on organizational behavior, email: psyansun@aliyun.com. Gao Riguang, Associate Professor of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Ph.D, mainly engaged in research on organizational leadership and organizational behavior.

Abstract: The frequent occurrence of corporate scandals has led to growing attention to the concept of “humble leadership”. At present, the academic circle mainly focuses on the humble behavior or characteristics of leaders, but lack of clarification of connotations of humble leadership. Taking 68 employees as a sample, this paper collects data through questionnaires and conducts a qualitative research. The results show that humble leadership in Chinese organizational situation includes four dimensions: moral model, humble behavior, steady wisdom and subordinate orientation. In other words, Chinese organizations place greater emphasis on virtue and show more subordinate-oriented behaviors. In addition, to combine humble behaviors with higher leadership skills can be more effective. Compared with other local leaders' behaviors, the difference between humble leadership and servant leadership lies in humble behaviors, while the difference between humble leadership and authentic leadership lies in such dimensions as moral model, steady wisdom and subordinate orientation.

Key words: modest, humble leadership, qualitative research, public servant leadership, authentic leadership